Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:32:41.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reform on My Terms: Partisan and Ideological Responses to a Corruption Scandal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Logan Dancey
Logan Dancey*
Affiliation:
Wesleyan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Political Scandal in American Politics
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 367 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, E. Scott. 2002. Why Congressional Reforms Fail: Reelection and the House Committee System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Basinger, Scott J. 2013. “Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (2): 385–98.Google Scholar
Best, Samuel J., Ladewig, Jeffrey W., and Wong, Danielle C.. 2013. “Owning Valence Issues: The Impact of a ‘Culture of Corruption’ on the 2006 Midterm Elections.” Congress & The Presidency 40 (2): 129–151.Google Scholar
Cobb, Michael D. and Taylor, Andrew J.. 2014. “Paging Congressional Democrats: It Was the Immorality, Stupid.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): this issue.Google Scholar
Doyle, Richard. 2011. “Real Reform or Change for Chumps: Earmark Policy Developments, 2006–2010.” Public Administration Review 71 (1): 34–44.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Flake, Jeff. 2006. “Earmarked Men.” New York Times, February. 9.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Shefter, Martin. 1999. Politics by Other Means: Politicians, Prosecutors, and the Press from Watergate to Whitewater. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kady, Martin II. 2006. “2006 Legislative Summary: Lobbying Rules.” CQ Weekly, December 18: 3341.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Second Edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the US Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W., Booth, R. J., and Francis, M.E.. 2007. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2007. Austin, TX: LIWC (www.liwc.net).Google Scholar
Poole, Isaiah. 2006. “Fight Over Earmarks Goes the Distance.” CQ Weekly May 1: 1164.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. 1998. “Coping with the Politics of Scandal.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 28 (4): 898–902.Google Scholar
Rosenson, Beth A. 2005. The Shadowlands of Conduct: Ethics and State Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Susan, and Grimaldi, James V.. 2006. “Abramoff Pleads Guilty to 3 Counts.” Washington Post, January 4.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 2007. Party Influence in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2005. The Power of the People: Congressional Competition, Public Attention, and Voter Retribution. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R.. 1997. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 226–39.Google Scholar