Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:00:19.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reading and Writing Constructivist Research in American Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Michael J. Struett
Michael J. Struett*
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Politics of Constructivist International Relations in the US Academy
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 79 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashley, Richard K. and Walker, R. B. J.. 1990. “Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldgeier, James and Jentleson, Bruce. (2015). “How to Bridge the Gap Between Policy and Scholarship.” War on the Rocks: The Schoolhouse (blog), June 29. http://warontherocks.com.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015a. “A Broader Conception of Political Science Publicity, or Why I Refuse DA-RT and Yet Did Not Sign the ‘Delay DA-RT’ Petition.” The Plot: Politics Decoded. December 3. http://www.the-plot.org/2015/12/03/a-broader-conception-of-political-science-publicity-or-why-i-refuse-da-rt/.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015b. “From the Editor: For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 2: 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich and Ruggie, John. 1986. “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State.” International Organization 40: 753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2012. TRIP Around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2007. “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?” American Political Science Review 101: 559–72.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2015. “Incentivizing the Manuscript-Review System Using REX.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (S1): 73–77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096515000451.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2015a. “Increasing the Credibility of Political Science Research: A Proposal for Journal Reforms.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (S1): 78–83.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2015b. “A Checklist Manifesto for Peer Review.” Political Methodologist (blog), December 4. http://thepoliticalmethodologist.com.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1998. Constructing the World Polity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Von Stein, Jana. 2005. “Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.Google Scholar