Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:32:54.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Public Administration of Politics, or What Political Science Could Learn from Public Administration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2007

Kenneth J. Meier
Kenneth J. Meier
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University and Cardiff University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of the John Gaus Award and Lectureship is to recognize “scholarship in the joint tradition of political science and public administration.” That tradition has a long and honorable history. Many of the presidents of the American Political Science Association were scholars of public administration (Frank J. Goodnow, Woodrow Wilson, W. W. Willoughby, Leonard White, Luther Gulick, Pendleton Herring, Emmette S. Redford, Carl J. Friedrich, James Q. Wilson, and Matthew Holden, Jr.) and several others made contributions to the literature (V. O. Key, Jr., Charles S. Hyneman, Robert A. Dahl, Aaron Wildavsky, and Elinor Ostrom). Yet a visitor from another planet studying political science and public administration might conclude that these tribes have evolved into two distinct species.Prepared for presentation as the John Gaus Distinguished Lecture, American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, September 1, 2006, Philadelphia. I would like to thank Paul Brace, George Krause, Alisa Hicklin, Larry O'Toole, Jim Rogers, and Michael Thies for their assistance.

Type
THE 2006 JOHN GAUS LECTURE
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 3 - 9
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Peri. 1986. Making the Managerial Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, Chester. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Belnap Press of Harvard.Google Scholar
Baron, David P., and John Ferejohn. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83 (December): 1181–206.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Douglas. 2005. “Foreword: Beyond Blakely and Booker: Pondering Modern Sentencing Process.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 (3): 653–88.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1956. Bureaucracy and Modern Society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bohte, John, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2000. “Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating.” Public Administration Review 60 (March/April): 173–82.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., and Richard Fleisher. 2000. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, Jeff Yates, and Brent D. Boyea. 2006. “The Effects of Case Selection, Judge Ideology, and Institutional Structure in Tort Litigation in State Supreme Courts.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Scott Gates. 1997. Working, Shirking and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Brack, and Richard Stillman. 1986. A Search for Public Administration: The Ideas and Career of Dwight Waldo. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., and John D. Lapinski. 2006. “Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1877–1994.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (January): 232–49.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1969. “Housing the Urban Poor: The Economics of Various Strategies.” American Economic Review 60 (September): 646–51.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Michael F. Thies. 2002. “The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (October): 760–71.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C._III. 1985. “Measuring Presidential Success in Congress: Alternative Approaches.” Journal of Politics 47 (2): 667–85.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III, Andrew Barrett, and Jeffrey Peake. 1997. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (April): 545–63.Google Scholar
Eisinger, Robert M. 2003. The Evolution of Presidential Polling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transactions Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Espino, Rodolfo_III. 2004. “Minority Interests, Majority Rules: Representation of Latinos in the U.S. Congress.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Ferlie, Ewan B., and Stephen M. Shortell. 2001. “Improving the Quality of Health Care in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Milbank Quarterly 79 (2): 281–315.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. 1999. “Partially Independent Central Banks, Politically Responsive Governments and Inflation.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (July): 681–706.Google Scholar
Gaus, John M. 1947. Reflections on Public Administration. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, John M. 1950. “Trends in the Theory of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 19 (summer): 161–8.Google Scholar
Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis. 2006. “Assessing Performance Budgeting at OMB: The Influence of Politics, Performance, and Program Size.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 169–86.Google Scholar
Goerdel, Holly T. 2006. “Taking Initiative: Proactive Management and Organizational Performance in Networked Environments.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (July): 351–67.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. 1900. Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2000. “The Parade of Sovereignties: Testing Theories of Succession in the Soviet Setting.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (January): 31–56.Google Scholar
Harris Poll. 2006. “Belief that Iraq Had Weapons of Mass Destruction Has Increased Substantially” (#57 July 21): www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=684, accessed September 20, 2006.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, Stephen Hanna, and Sahar Shafqat. 1997. “The Liberal-Conservative Ideology of U.S. Senators: A New Measure.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (October): 1395–413.Google Scholar
Holzer, Marc, and Kathe Callahan. 1998. Government at Work: Best Practices and Model Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hult, Karen M., and Charles E. Walcott. 2004. Empowering the White House: Governance under Nixon, Ford, and Carter. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Tracy Sulkin, and Heather A. Larsen. 2003. “Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 151–69.Google Scholar
Kato, Junko. 1994. The Problem of Bureaucratic Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1960. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1985. Time, Chance, and Organizations: Natural Selection in a Perilous Environment. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Krause, George A. 1999. A Two Way Street: Institutional Dynamics of the Modern Administrative State. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Krause, George A. 2003. “Coping with Uncertainty: Analyzing Risk Propensities of SEC Budgetary Decisions, 1949–1997.” American Political Science Review 97 (February): 171–88.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1998. “Events, Equilibria and Government Survival.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (January): 28–54.Google Scholar
Lemann, Nicholas. 2004. “Remember the Alamo.” New Yorker, October 18, 158.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracies in Plural Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1999. “Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation.” American Political Science Review 93 (March): 183–7.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian S., Dan Miodownik, and Roy J. Eidelson. 2004. “Succession in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It?” American Political Science Review 98 (May): 209–30.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill. 2001. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg. 2004. “Policing the Bargain: Coalition Government and Parliamentary Scrutiny.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (January): 13–27.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. 2004. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Analysis 12 (2): 128–42.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew, Roger G. Noll, and Barry Weingast. 1989. “Structure and Process as Solutions to the Politician's Principal Agency Problem?” Virginia Law Review 74: 431–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurley, Carl, and Jeffery J. Mondak. 1995. “Inspected by #1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents' Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (November): 864–85.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 2005. “ School Boards and the Politics of Education Policy: Downstream Consequences of Structure.” In The Politics of Democratic Inclusion, eds. Rodney Hero and Christina Wolbrecht. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 238–56.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. 2003. “Public Management and Educational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Networking.” Public Administration Review 63 (November/December): 689–99.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. 2004. “Unsung Impossible Jobs: The Politics of Public Management.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. 2006a. Bureaucracy in a Democratic State: A Governance Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. 2006b. “Management Theory and Occam's Razor: How Public Organizations Buffer the Environment.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Joseph Stewart Jr. 1991. “Cooperation and Conflict in Multiracial School Districts.” Journal of Politics 53 (November): 1123–33.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Translated by Eden and Cedar Paul. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 2000. Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr. 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 57 (January): 45–52.Google Scholar
O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr., and Kenneth J. Meier. 1999. “Modeling the Impact of Public Management: The Implications of Structural Context.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (October): 505–26.Google Scholar
O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr., and Kenneth J. Meier. 2003. “Plus ça Change: Public Management, Personnel Stability, and Organizational Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (January): 43–64.Google Scholar
Owens, Christopher T. 2005. “Black Substantive Representation in State Legislatures 1971–1994.” Social Science Quarterly 86 (December): 779–91.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, James P. 2006. “The First MBA President: The Public Administration Legacy of George W. Bush.” Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2006. “Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (January): 25–44.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2000. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R. 2006. “The Conditional Effects of Minority Descriptive Representation.” Journal of Politics 68 (August): 585–99.Google Scholar
Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (March): 1–33.Google Scholar
Robinson, Scott E., Floun'say Caver, Kenneth J. Meier, and Laurence J. O'Toole Jr. 2007. “Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratic Centralization, Organizational Size and the Punctuated Equilibrium Theory of Public Agency Budgets.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (January, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Rourke, Francis. 1969. Bureaucracy, Politics and Public Policy. Boston: Little-Brown.Google Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew. 2002. Managing the President's Program. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.” American Political Science Review 83: 557–65.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1997. Administrative Behavior, 5th edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Spriggs, James F., and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1997. “Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (June): 365–86.Google Scholar
“The Verdict Is In: Throw Out Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Judges Tell A.B.A. Journal Poll.” 1993. American Bar Association Journal (October): 78.Google Scholar
Thies, Michael F. 2001. “Keeping Tabs on Partners: The Logic of Delegation in Coalition Governments.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (July): 580–98.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Justin S., and Jose D. Villalobos. 2007. “The Managing of the Presidency: Applying Theory-Driven Empirical Models to the Study of White House Bureaucratic Performance.” Prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Wahlbeck, Paul J., James F. Spriggs, and Forrest Maltzman. 1998. “Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (January): 294–315.Google Scholar
Walcott, Charles E., and Karen M. Hult. 1995. Governing the White House: From Hoover through LBJ. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Timothy Bledsoe. 1998. Urban Reforms and Its Consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wood, B. Dan, and Richard W. Waterman. 1994. Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar