Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:41:46.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Professional Conferences and the Challenges of Studying Black Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2015

Nikol G. Alexander-Floyd
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Byron D’Andra Orey
Affiliation:
Jackson State University
Khalilah Brown-Dean
Affiliation:
Quinnipiac University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Profession Symposium: Reinventing the Scholarly Conference: Reflections from the Field
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander-Floyd, Nikol G. 2014. “Why Political Scientists Don’t Study Black Women, but Historians and Sociologists Do: On Intersectionality and the Remapping of the Study of Black Political Women.” National Political Science Review 16: 118.Google Scholar
Alexander-Floyd, Nikol G. 2012. “Disappearing Acts: Reclaiming Intersectionality in the Social Sciences in a Post–Black Feminist Era.” Feminist Formations 24 (1): 125.Google Scholar
Alexander-Floyd, Nikol G. 2007. Gender, Race, and Nationalism in Contemporary Black Politics. New York: Palgrave MacMilan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Political Science Association. 2011. Political Science in the 21st Century. APSA Task Force Report. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 1995. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Leela. 1997. Producing Workers: The Politics of Gender, Class, and Culture in the Calcutta Jute Mills. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, Stan, and Reed, Edward S.. 1994. “Two Social Psychologists of Prejudice: Gordon W. Allport, W. E. B. DuBois, and the Legacy of Booker T. Washington.” Journal of Black Psychology 20: 828.Google Scholar
Gillman, Laura. 2010. Unassimilable Feminisms: Reappraising Feminist, Womanist, and Mestiza Identity Politics. New York: Palgrave MacMilan.Google Scholar
Harris, Rose. 1999. “Signifying Race and Gender in Feminist Theory.” PhD dissertation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University. Google Scholar
Jones, Mack. 1972. “A Frame of Reference for Black Politics.” In Black Political Life in the United States: A Fist as the Pendulum, ed. Henderson, Lenneal J., 720. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Jordan-Zachery, Julia. 2014. “I Ain’t your Darn Help: Black Women as the Help in Intersectionality Research.” National Political Science Review 16: 1930.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Conquest. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCormick, Joseph. 2012. “Beyond Tactical Withdrawal: An Early History of the National Conference of Black Political Scientists.” National Political Science Review 13: 158–79.Google Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. Space Invaders: Race, Gender, and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark C. 2012. “The Scholarly Conference: Do We Want Democracy and Markets or Authority and Tradition?” Journal of Political Science Education 8: 333–51.Google Scholar
Woodard, Maurice. 1977. “Introduction.” In Blacks and Political Science, ed. Woodard, Maurice. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar