Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:44:54.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Campaigning in the 2002 Congressional Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

Luke J. Keele ,
Brian J. Fogarty  and
James A. Stimson
Luke J. Keele
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, Oxford University
Brian J. Fogarty
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
James A. Stimson
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many different elements make up the strength of a president, but a president with a majority in both houses of Congress works from a position of power. While a congressional majority does not guarantee that a president can pass his agenda (witness Jimmy Carter and the first two years of the Clinton presidency), a president that has majority in Congress will have natural allies instead of natural enemies when he works to enact his legislative agenda.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 827 - 832
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Congressional Quarterly's Politics in America. 2002. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Heckman James A. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161.Google Scholar
Imai Kosuke, and David A. van Dyk. 2004, forthcoming. “Casual Inference with General Treatment Regimes: Generalizing the Propensity Score.” Journal of the American Statistical Association. New York Times. November 6, 2002.Google Scholar
The Cook Political Report. August 2002. Washington, D.C.: National Political Review, Inc.Google Scholar
Washington Post. November 7, 2002.Google Scholar