Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:55:59.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Science Research in Settings of Intractable Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2019

Diana B. Greenwald*
Affiliation:
City College of New York

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Reflections on Scholarship and Fieldwork in the Middle East and North Africa
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arjona, Ana. 2016. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakke, Kristin M. 2015. Decentralization and Intrastate Struggles: Chechnya, Punjab, and Québec. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, Daniel. 2007. “Sociopsychological Foundations of Intractable Conflicts.” American Behavioral Scientist 50 (11): 1430–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broers, Laurence. 2015. “From ‘Frozen Conflict’ to Enduring Rivalry: Reassessing the Nagorno–Karabakh Conflict.” Nationalities Papers: Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 43 (4): 556–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2014. “On Ethics and Implications.” The Ethics of Research in the Middle East. No. 8 in Project on Middle East Political Science Studies, 1921.Google Scholar
Clionadh, Raleigh, Linke, Andrew, Hegre, Håvard, and Karlsen, Joakim. 2010. “Introducing ACLED-Armed Conflict Location and Event Data.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (5): 651–60.Google Scholar
Coleman, Peter T. 2003. “Characteristics of Protracted, Intractable Conflict: Toward the Development of a Meta Framework.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 9 (1): 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, Hoeffler, Anke, and Söderbom, Måns. 2004. “On the Duration of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 41 (3): 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Svante E. 2017. The International Politics of the Armenian–Azerbaijani Conflict: The Original “Frozen Conflict” and European Security. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate, and Lake, Milli. 2018. “Ethics Abroad: Fieldwork in Fragile and Violent Contexts.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 18.Google Scholar
Cunningham, David E. 2006. “Veto Players and Civil War Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 875–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, David E., Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Salehyan, Idean. 2009. “It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4): 570–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” International Organization 52 (2): 269305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2012. “Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 717–23.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 615–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, Eleanor. 2019. “Beyond the Field: Ethics after Fieldwork in Politically Dynamic Contexts.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 140153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesberg, Louis. 1998. “Intractable Conflicts.” In The Handbook of Interethnic Coexistence, ed. Weiner, Eugene, 332–42. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian S. 1993. Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank and Gaza. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
MacLean, Lauren M. 2013. “The Power of the Interviewer.” In Interview Research in Political Science, ed. Mosley, Layna, 67–83. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
MacLean, Lauren M., Posner, Elliot, Thomson, Susan, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2017. “Research Ethics: Human Subjects and Research Openness.” APSA Draft Report, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations Working Group I.2.Google Scholar
Pearlman, Wendy. 2011. Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, Therése, and Eck, Kristine. 2018. “Organized Violence, 1989–2017.” Journal of Peace Research 55 (4): 535–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniland, Paul. 2012. “Organizing Insurgency: Networks, Resources, and Rebellion in South Asia.” International Security 37 (1): 142–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2013. “Academic Integrity and Ethical Responsibilities in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Working with Research Ethics Boards to Prepare for Fieldwork with ‘Human Subjects.’” In Emotional and Ethical Challenges for Field Research in Africa: The Story Behind the Findings, eds. Thomson, Susan, Ansoms, An, and Murison, Jude, 139–54. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2004. “Does Conflict Beget Conflict? Explaining Recurring Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 41 (3): 371–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welt, Cory. 2010. “The Thawing of a Frozen Conflict: The Internal Security Dilemma and the 2004 Prelude to the Russo–Georgian War.” Europe–Asia Studies 62 (1): 6397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Stefan. 2011. “A Resolvable Frozen Conflict? Designing a Settlement for Transnistria.” Nationalities Papers: Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 39 (6): 863–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth. 2006. “The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones.” Qualitative Sociology 29: 307–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth. 2007. “Field Research.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, eds. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan, 123146. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar