Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:54:06.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Science and the Corporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2022

David Menninger
David Menninger*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1977, Charles Lindblom concluded his study of Politics and Markets with the assertion that “the large private corporation fits oddly into democratic theory and vision. Indeed, it does not fit.” In 1983, Robert Reich envisioned The Next American Frontier as the eradication of the distinction between business culture and civic culture in the United States and the full integration of the corporation into the country's key political and social processes. Failure to achieve such a new political-economic compact could mean, Reich asserted, the end of democracy's progress in America. Between Lindblom and Reich lie six short years in time and one vast gulf in political theory and policy perspective. Their positions set the framework for a whole series of political choices confronting American politics today. They also set an agenda for political science as a discipline that studies power, authority, and social change—an agenda calling for an expansion of both intellectual focus and analytical paradigms.

Differences between the purposes and contents of Lindblom's and Reich's studies can be cited, of course. Politics and Markets presents itself as a scholarly work in the theory of political economy, whereas The Next American Frontier has a definite prescriptive flavor designed to influence current political debate. But such differences do not obscure the important element shared by the two books: recognition of the power and position of large corporations as the determining factor in the political-economic future of liberal democracy. Generated from this are several critical questions both authors confront: What is the purpose of public power and that of private economic power in advanced industrial societies today? What should be the relationship between the two as regards the preservation of liberal democracy? What is that relationship when the large corporation is taken into account? What redirection of corporate power is necessary or possible? What blending of corporate institutions and political institutions does liberal democracy allow—or demand?

Type
Business and Politics
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Spring 1985 , pp. 206 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lindblom, Charles, Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books, 1977), p. 356.Google Scholar

2 Reich, Robert B., The Next American Frontier (New York: Times Books, 1983).Google Scholar

3 Schattschneider, E. E., The Semisovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960).Google Scholar

4 Reagan, Michael D., The Managed Economy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

5 McConnell, Grant, Private Power and American Democracy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1966).Google Scholar

6 Lustig, R. Jeffrey, Corporate Liberalism: The Origins of American Political Theory 1890–1920 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982).Google Scholar

7 Peters, Thomas J. and Waterman, Robert H., In Search of Excellence (New York: Harper and Row, 1982).Google Scholar

8 Cox, Allan, The Cox Report on the American Corporation (New York: Delacorte Press, 1982).Google Scholar

9 LaPalombara, Joseph, “Assessing the Political Environment for Business: A New Role for Political Scientists?” PS, Vol. XV, No. 2 (Spring, 1982), pp. 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar