Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:24:50.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Directions in Legislative Research: Lessons from Inside Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2016

Michael H. Crespin  and
Anthony J. Madonna
Michael H. Crespin
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Anthony J. Madonna
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Politics Symposium: The Transformed Congressional Experience
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 473 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Jones, Philip E.. 2010. “Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science. 54: 583–97.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2014. “The Punctuated Origins of Senate Polarization.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 39 (1): 5–26.Google Scholar
Bovitz, Gregory L. and Carson, Jamie. 2006. “Position-Taking and Electoral Accountability in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly. 59 (2): 297–312.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., Madonna, Anthony J. and Smith, Steven S.. 2007. “Going Nuclear, Senate Style.” Perspectives on Politics. 5 (4): 729–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review. 96 (1): 127–140.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie, Crespin, Michael, Finocchiaro, Charles, and Rohde, David. 2007. “Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35 (6): 878–904.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Poole, Keith T.. 2002. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 477–489.Google Scholar
Crespin, Michael and Rohde, David W.. 2010. “Dimensions, Issues and Bills: Appropriations Voting on the House Floor.” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 976–989.Google Scholar
Crespin, Michael, Hayden, Jessica, Madonna, Anthony, and Shen, Ivy. 2016. “Building an Electoral Record: The Increase in Procedural Traceability in Congress.” Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, San Juan, PR.Google Scholar
Curry, James M. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dick, Jason. 2016. “The Ryan Speakership Will be On Time.” Roll Call, January 13.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Keith L., Lynch, Michael S. and Madonna, Anthony J.. 2014. “Partisan Agenda Control and the Dimensionality of Congress.” American Politics Research 42: 600–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael S. and Madonna, Anthony J.. 2013. “Viva Voce: Implications from the Disappearing Voice Vote, 1865–1996.” Social Science Quarterly. 94: 530–550.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael S., Madonna, Anthony J., and Roberts, Jason M.. 2016. “The House Majority Party and the Rules Committee: Bargaining over Chamber Procedure.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lipinski, Daniel. 2001. “The Effect of Messages Communicated by Members of Congress: The Impact of Publicizing Votes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. 26 (1): 81–100.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jason A. 2010. “Limitation Riders and Congressional Influence over Bureaucratic Policy Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 104 (04): 766–782.Google Scholar
Madonna, Anthony. 2011. “Institutions and Coalition Formation: Revisiting the Effects of Rule XXII on Winning Coalition Sizes in the U.S. Senate.” American Journal of Political Science. 55: 276–288.Google Scholar
Madonna, Anthony J. and Kosar, Kevin R.. 2015. “An Open Amending Process in the Modern U.S. Senate: An Appraisal,” R Street Policy Study No. 42, October. http://www.rstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/RSTREET42.pdf Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan M., Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2006. “Party Polarization in the US Congress Member Replacement and Member Adaptation.” Party Politics 12 (4): 483–503.Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory and Schickler, Eric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the US Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar