Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:12:26.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Muslim Public Self-Presentation: Interrogating the Liberal Public Sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2008

Salwa Ismail
Salwa Ismail
Affiliation:
SOAS, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this article I want to address a number of issues thrust into the open by different manifestations of Islamist politics and the intersection of religion and identity politics in Western societies. This intersection should be read in conjunction with the emergence in Muslim-majority societies of forms of political activism that ground themselves in Islamic doctrines and invoke religious traditions as frames of reference. It is necessary in reading the contentions surrounding Muslim identity politics in Western settings that we take into account factors shaping the dynamics of interaction between Western countries and Muslim societies, not least among which are the long-standing historical relations associated with the colonial experience and its aftermath.An earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference, Diversity and National Identity in the European Union: Multicultural Challenges, at the Instituto Portuges de Relaçoes Internacionais, University Nova de Lisboa. Lisbon, March 22–23, 2007, Lisbon. This revised version benefited from presentations by Nacira Guénif-Souilamas and Schirin Amir-Moazami at the workshop, Conceptions of Islam, University of Bergen, August 27–31 2007, Bergen.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 25 - 29
Copyright
© 2008 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu Lughod, Lila. 2002. “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others.” American Anthropologist 104 (3): 78–790.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Leila. 1992. Women and Gender in Islam. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. 2006. “Responses.” In Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, ed. David Scott and Charles Hirschkind. Stanford University Press, 206–41.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas.” Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Çinar, Alev. 2005. Modernity, Islam and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies, Places and Time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard. 1992. Colonialism and Its forms of Knowledge: The British in India. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Fredrick. 1992. “Colonizing Time: Work Rhythms and Labour Conflict in Colonial Mombasa.” In Colonialism and Culture, ed. Nicholas Dirks. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press, 209–45.Google Scholar
Ener, Mine. 2003. Managing Egypt's Poor and the Politics of Benevolence 1800–1952. New York: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, Mayanthi. 2005. “The Republic's Second Religion: Recognizing Islam in France.” Middle East Report 235 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gasper, Michael. 2001. “Abdallah al-Nadim, Islamic Reform, and ‘Ignorant’ Peasants: State-Building in Egypt?” In Muslim Traditions and Modern Techniques of Power, ed. Armando Salvatore. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 75–92.Google Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer. 2002. “Islam in Public: New Visibilities and New Imaginaries.” Public Culture 14 (1): 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guénif-Souilamas, Nacira. 2003. “Ni pute, ni soumise ou très pute, très voilé? Les inévitables contradictions d'un féminsime sous influence.” Cosmopolitiques 4: 53–65.Google Scholar
Guénif-Souilamas, Nacira. 2002. “L'enfermement viriliste: des garçons arabes plus vrais que nature.” Cosmpolitiques 2: 47–59.Google Scholar
Hindess, Barry. 2001. “The Liberal Government of Unfreedom.” Alternatives 26 (2): 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, Salwa. 2007. “Islamism, Re-Islamisation and the Fashioning of Muslim Selves: Refiguring the Public Sphere.” Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 4 (1). www.bepress.com/mwjhr/vol4/iss1/art3.Google Scholar
Le Monde. 2003. “Le Rapport de La Commision Stasi sur la Laïcité.” December 13.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mas, Ruth. 2006. “Compelling the Muslim Subject: Memory as Post-Colonial Violence and the Public Performativity of ‘Secular and Cultural Islam.’” The Muslim World 96 (October): 585–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moallem, Minoo. 2005. Between Warrior Brother and Veiled Sister: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Politics of Patriarchy in Iran. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Panikkar, K N. 1995. Culture, Ideology, Hegemony: Intellectuals and Social Consciousness in India. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1992. “The Mass Public and the Mass Subject.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Graig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 377–401.Google Scholar