Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:17:43.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making an Impression: New Media in the 2008 Presidential Nomination Campaigns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Audrey A. Haynes  and
Brian Pitts
Audrey A. Haynes
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Brian Pitts
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Just as radio and television revolutionized the presidential election process in earlier decades, today the “new media” are making a significant imprint on how campaigns are conducted by candidates, covered by journalists, and evaluated by the voters. While the same basic goals for campaigns apply, the tools to accomplish these goals have expanded.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 53 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom, Joel D. 2003. “The Blogosphere: How a Once-Humble Medium Came to Drive Elite Media Discourse and Influence Public Policy and Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W., and Farrell, Henry. 2004. “The Power and Politics of Blogs.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August.Google Scholar
Johnson, Thomas J., Kaye, Barbara, Bichard, Shannon L., and Wong, Joann W.. 2007. “Every Blog Has Its Day: Politically Interested Internet Users' Perceptions of Blog Credibility.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications 13 (1): article 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaid, Lynda Lee. 2003. “Effects of Political Information in the 2000 Presidential Campaign.” American Behavioral Scientist 46: 677–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson-Borders, Gracie, and Kirk, Rita. 2005. “Blogs in Campaign Communication.” American Behavioral Scientist 49 (4): 548–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Michael. 2007. “Democrats Lead in Raising Money Online.” New York Times, July 13.Google Scholar
McKenna, Laura, and Pole, Antoinette. 2004. “Do Blogs Matter? Weblogs in American Politics.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2005. “News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trammell, Kaye D., Williams, Andrew P., Postelnicu, Ana M., and Landreville, Kristen D.. 2006. “Evolution of Online Campaigning: Increasing Interactivity in Candidate Web Sites and Blogs through Text and Technical Features.” Mass Communication and Society 9 (1): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Paul, and Tedesco, John, eds. 2006. The Internet Election: Perspectives on the Web's Role in Campaign 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Zeigler, Todd. 2007. “Ron Paul and Distributed Online Campaigning.” Blog post. The Bivings Report, June 21. http://www.bivingsreport.com/2007/ron-paul-and-distributed-online-campaigning/.Google Scholar