Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:11:17.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Likeable? Effective Commander in Chief? Polling on Candidate Traits in the “Year of the Presidential Woman”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Barbara Burrell
Barbara Burrell
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Clinton Eclipses Obama and Edwards on Leadership” a Gallup Poll report headlined in January 2007. Gallup chose eight characteristics to determine this assessment, including being most qualified to be president, is the strongest leader, would be the best in a crisis, would manage the government most effectively, and would work the best with Congress. In a summary of its findings, the report concludes: “Among the characteristics and qualities tested, Clinton's strong points are almost uniformly related to presidential leadership. She holds a formidable lead on many items in this category, including being qualified to be president and being a strong leader” (Saad 2007).

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 747 - 752
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asher, Herbert. 2007. Polling and the Public. 7thed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Burns, James McGregor. 1978. Leadership. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2002. “Knowing Congress as a Gendered Institution: Manliness and the Implications of Women in Congress.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 20–49.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 2006. “Presidential Elections: Gendered Space and the Case of 2004.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, ed. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. New York: NY: Cambridge University Press, 12–42.Google Scholar
Han, Lori Cox. 2003. “Presidential Leadership: Governance from a Woman's Perspective.” In Anticipating Madam President, ed. Watson, Robert P. and Gordon, Ann. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner Publishers., 163–176.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Science Quarterly. (Fall).Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (September): 560–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., Abelson, Robert P., and Fiske, Susan T.. 1980. “Presidential Prototypes.” Political Behavior 2 (4): 315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightman, David. 2008. “Democrats Hold Spirited Debate.” Knight Ridder Washington Bureau, January 5.Google Scholar
Milligan, Susan. 2008. “Clinton's Struggle Vexes Feminists: To Some Her Skills Losing Out to Style.” Boston Globe, February 19. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/19/clintons_struggle_vexes_feminists/.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad, Lydia. 2007. “Clinton Eclipses Obama and Edwards on Leadership.” Gallup Poll News Service, January 31.Google Scholar
Traugott, Michael, and Lavrakas, Paul J.. 2000. The Voter's Guide to Election Polls. 2nded. New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar