Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:40:15.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legislative Explorer: Data-Driven Discovery of Lawmaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 December 2014

Nicholas Stramp  and
John Wilkerson
Nicholas Stramp
Affiliation:
University of Washington
John Wilkerson
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interactive visualizations are used widely in the natural sciences to facilitate discovery in “big-data” research. This article introduces a project that applies the same data-driven discovery approach to politics. Lawmaking is a complex process that can be difficult to convey in a constructive way, whether the audience is the general public, students, or researchers. Legislative Explorer (available at http://www.legex.org) visualizes the progress of more than 250,000 congressional bills and resolutions introduced since 1973. Users of all abilities can engage with actual data to discover how bills become law. Filters designed by domain experts guide them toward key insights. It is our hope that Legislative Explorer promotes greater understanding of a much-maligned institution.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. 2012. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baughman, John R. 2006. Common Ground: Committee Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Royce, Lewis, Jeff, Lo, James, McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2011. “DW-NOMINATE Scores with Bootstrapped Standard Errors.” Available at http://voteview.com/dwnomin.htm. Accessed February 1, 2014.Google Scholar
Jones, Vivian C. 2008. “Tariff Modifications: Miscellaneous Tariff Bills.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Kniss, Joe, Hansen, Charles, Grenier, Michel, and Robinson, Tom. 2002. “Volume Rendering Multivariate Data to Visualize Meteorological Simulations: A Case Study.” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Data Visualisation 2002. Geneva: Eurographics Association.Google Scholar
Langley, Pat. 1981. “Data-Driven Discovery of Physical Laws.” Cognitive Science 5 (1): 31–54.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2011. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Stewart III, Charles, and Woon, Jonathan. 2005. “Congressional Committee Assignments, 103rd to 109th Congresses, 1993–2005.” Available at http://web.mit.edu/17.251/www/data. Accessed February 1, 2014.Google Scholar
Wagemans, Johan, Feldman, Jacob, Gepshtein, Sergei, Kimchi, Ruth, Pomerantz, James, and Helm, Peter van der. 2012. “A Century of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception: II. Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations.” Psychological Bulletin 138 (6): 1218–1252.Google Scholar