Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:32:13.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is School Desegregation Still a Viable Policy Option?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Jennifer Hochschild
Jennifer Hochschild*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 458 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armor, D. 1995. Forced Justice: School Desegregation and Law. New York: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, R. et al. 1983. Surveys of Magnet Schools. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
Byrk, A. et al. , 1993. A View from the Elementary Schools: The State of Reform in Chicago. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago Schools Research.Google Scholar
Clough, R., and Utchitelle, S. 1995. Complete Twelfth Report to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri. Voluntary Interdistrict Coordinating Council for the Settlement Agreement.Google Scholar
Consortium for Policy Research in Education. 1997. Public Policy and School Reform: A Research Summary. University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
Cooperative Institutional Research Program. 1991. The American Freshman: Twenty-Five Year Trends. Los Angeles: UCLA, Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
Cooperative Institutional Research Program. 1992. The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1992. Los Angeles: UCLA, Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Patricia. 1994. “Only Difference: How Best to Desegregate,” USA Today. 12 May.Google Scholar
Frahm, R. 1994. “Q and A with the Governor,” Hartford Courant. 14 July: A4.Google Scholar
Frahm, R. 1996. “Residents as Divided as Court on Sheff,” Hartford Courant. 16 August.Google Scholar
Harris, L., and Associates. 1978. A Study of Attitudes Toward Racial and Religious Minorities and Toward Women. New York: Louis Harris and Associates.Google Scholar
Harris, L., and Associates. 1989. The Unfinished Agenda on Race in America, vol 1. New York: Louis Harris and Associates.Google Scholar
Hochschild, J. 1984. The New American Dilemma: Liberal Democracy and School Desegregation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Judson, G. 1994. “Integration by Choice: Connecticut Struggles,” New York Times. 7 October: A4.Google Scholar
Libov, C. 1996. “Racial Report on Schools: The Fallout.” New York Times 31 January II CN.Google Scholar
Lincoln Park Taxpayers Association Education Committee. 1977. “Report.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lissitz, R. 1994. Assessment of Student Performance and Attitude, Year IV-1994. Report submitted to the Voluntary Interdistrict Coordinating Council, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D., and Neal, T. 1996. “In P.G., a New School of Thought,” Washington Post. 28 July.Google Scholar
National Institute of Education. 1978. Violent Schools, Safe Schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Orfield, G., Bachmeier, M., James, D., and Eitle, T. 1997. “Deepening Segregation in American Public Schools.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University School of Education.Google Scholar
Orfield, G., Eaton, S. et al. , 1996. Dismantling Desegregation: A Quiet Reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Payne, C. 1997. “‘I Don't Want Your Nasty Pot of Gold’: Urban School Climate Revisited.” Chicago: Northwestern University, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
Rossell, C. 1990. The Carrot or the Stick for School Desegregation Policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossell, C. 1995. “Controlled-Choice Desegregation Plans: Not Enough Choice, Too Much Control?” Urban Affairs Review 31(1): 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, J. 1996. “Court Still Looms for School Dispute.” Florida Times-Union. 11 August.Google Scholar
Scovronick, N. 1996. “Education Policy and Politics.” Princeton: Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Sloane, W. 1996. “Sheff Decision is Opportunity to Reinvent the School System,” Hartford Courant. 2 September.Google Scholar
Stave, S. 1995. Achieving Racial Balance: Case Studies of Contemporary School Desegregation. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Traub, J. 1994. “Can Separate be Equal?” Harper's Magazine. June.Google Scholar
Trimble, C.S., and Forsaith, A.. 1995. “Achieving Equality and Excellence in Kentucky Education.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 28(3): 599–653.Google Scholar
Taxpayers Organization of North East Yonkers Educational Committee. 1978. TONEY Report on School Reorganization Phase #2 Printed in the Herald Statesman, 5 March.Google Scholar