Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T21:31:15.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2017

Marissa Brookes
Marissa Brookes*
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Road Less Traveled: An Agenda for Mixed-Methods Research
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 1015 - 1018
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahram, Ariel I. 2013. “Concepts and Measurement in Multimethod Research.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (2): 280–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Ariel, and Sil, Rudra. 2012. “When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism—or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (4): 935–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, Abhishek. 2013. “Ontology, Epistemology, and Multimethod Research in Political Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1): 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Elman, Colin. 2010. “Qualitative and Multimethod Research: Organizations, Publications, and Reflections on Integration.” In The Oxford Handbook on Political Methodology, ed. Box-Steffensmeir, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, 779–95. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1999. “Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Politics 31 (4): 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, John W., and Plano Clark, Vicki L.. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2008. “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” In Oxford Handbook for Political Methodology, ed. Brady, Henry E., Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Collier, David, 756–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2017. Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Jennifer C. 2008. “Is Mixed-Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology?” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2 (1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Jennifer C. 2007. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry, Vol. 9. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Greene, Jennifer C., Caracelli, Valerie J., and Graham, Wendy F.. 1989. “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (3): 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2015. “Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach.” American Political Science Review 109 (4): 653–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jick, Todd. 1979. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (4): 602–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. Burke, Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and Turner, Lisa A.. 2007. “Toward a Definition of Mixed-Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (2): 112–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, David, and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2009. “Does It, Really? Measurement Error and Omitted Variables in Multi-Method Research.” Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 7 (2): 18–22.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2010. “Bridging the Qualitative–Quantitative Divide: Best Practices in the Development of Historically Oriented Replication Databases.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., and Burke Johnson, R.. 2006. “The Validity Issue in Mixed Research.” Research in the Schools 13 (1): 48–63.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2013. “Combining QCA and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretical Multi-Method Research.” Sociological Methods and Research 42 (4): 559–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. “Case-Selection Techniques in Case-Study Research.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. “Bridging the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 471–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, Abbas, and Teddlie, Charles. 2010. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, Nicholas, and Barnes, Jeb. 2014. Finding Pathways: Mixed-Method Research for Studying Causal Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar