Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:49:17.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Michelle D. Deardorff
Michelle D. Deardorff*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Profession Symposium: Assessment in Political Science Redux
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 83 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Deardorff, Michelle D., Hamann, Kerstin, and Ishiyama, John, eds. 2009. Assessment in Political Science. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Aldrich, John H.. 2015. “How Can Political Science Better Communicate its Value: 12 Recommendations from the APSA Task Force.” PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (S1) September: 1–19.Google Scholar
Shaw, Claire. 2015. “Unloved and Sidelined: Why Are Social Sciences Neglected by Politicians?” The Guardian, March 11. Available at www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2015/mar/11/unloved-and-sidelined-why-are-social-sciences-neglected-by-politicians.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John C. 1991. “Liberal Learning and the Political Science Major: A Report to the Profession.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24:48–60.Google Scholar