Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:11:54.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Being Early: Presidential Primary Front-Loading and the Impact of the Proposed Western Regional Primary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2008

Travis N. Ridout  and
Brandon Rottinghaus
Travis N. Ridout
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Brandon Rottinghaus
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Every state wants to be “the” state that selects the next president. Every state wants the attention of the presidential candidates and wants its voters to have a say in the presidential nomination process. But since the early 1980s, presidential nomination events in more and more states have essentially been meaningless as the parties' nominations have effectively been wrapped up before citizens have cast their primary ballots or attended their local caucuses.

Type
FEATURES
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 123 - 128
Copyright
© 2008 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nominating Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabak, Mark Z. 2006. “Democrats May Make January Presidential Primary Month.” Los Angeles Times, August 18.Google Scholar
Berg-Andersson, Richard E. The Green Papers. www.TheGreenPapers.com ( September 7, 2006).Google Scholar
Busch, Andrew E. 1997. Outsiders and Openness in the Presidential Nominating System. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Cillizza, Chris. 2007. “Democrats Pick Denver for 2008 Convention.” Washington Post, January 12.Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission. 2000. “2000 Presidential Primary Dates and Candidate Filing Deadlines for Ballot Access.” June 23. www.fec.gov/pages/2kdates.htm (September 7, 2006).Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission. 2004. “2004 Presidential Primary Dates and Candidate Filing Deadlines for Ballot Access.” May 26. www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2004/2004pdates.pdf (September 7, 2006).Google Scholar
Massey, Barry. 2004. “Western Governors Look at Early Presidential Primary in 2008.” The Associated Press State & Local Wire, June 22.Google Scholar
Mayer, William G., and Andrew E. Busch. 2004. The Front-Loading Problem in Presidential Nominations. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1995. “Effects of Horse-Race Coverage on Campaign Coffers: Strategic Contributing in Presidential Primaries.” Journal of Politics 57 (4): 1015–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagourney, Adam. 2006. “Democrats Set Primary Calendar and Penalties.” New York Times, August 20.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 1992. Super Tuesday: Regional Politics and Presidential Primaries. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 1993. “Nominations Choices: Caucuses and Primary Outcomes, 1976–88.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scala, Dante J. 2003. “Re-reading the Tea Leaves: New Hampshire as a Barometer of Presidential Primary Success.” PS: Political Science 36 (April): 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Harold W., and Charles D. Hadley. 1987. “The Southern Presidential Primary: Regional Intentions with National Implications.” Publis 17 (3): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steger, Wayne P., Andrew J. Dowdle, and Randall E. Adkins. 2004. “The New Hampshire Effect in Presidential Nominations.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergakis, Brock. 2006. “Utah Seeks to Thrust West Into Presidential Primary Spotlight.” The Associated Press State & Local Wire, March 24.Google Scholar
Western Governors' Association. Management Directive on Western Regional Primary. www.westgov.org/wga/policy/04/caucus.pdf (August 21, 2006; report no longer available).Google Scholar