Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:17:09.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the American Political Science Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Samuel C. Patterson ,
John M. Bruce  and
Martha Ellis Crone
Samuel C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
John M. Bruce
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Martha Ellis Crone
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 765 - 774
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1991

References

Bakanic, Von, McPhail, Clark, and Simon, Rita J. 1987. “The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process.” American Sociological Review 52: 631–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakanic, Von, McPhail, Clark, and Simon, Rita J. 1989. “Mixed Messages: Referees' Comments on the Manuscripts They Review.” Sociological Quarterly 30: 639–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, James A. and Sigelman, Lee. 1985. “Accrediting Knowledge: Journal Stature and Citation Impact in Social Science.” Social Science Quarterly 66: 964–75.Google Scholar
Clausen, Aage R. and Wu, Jaushieh J. 1988. “Social Science History: Citation Record, 1976–1985.” Social Science History 12: 197–215.Google Scholar
Crane, Dianna. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garand, James C. 1990. “An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 23: 448–51.Google Scholar
Garfield, Eugene. 1972. “Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation.” Science 178: 471–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, Micheal W. and Wright, Gerald C. 1975. “Political Scientists' Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 8: 254–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Mizell, Francie, and Patterson, David. 1989. “Political Scientists' Journal Evaluations Revisited.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22: 613–17.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Patterson, David, and Mizell, Francie. 1989. “Discretion in Editorial Decision-Making: The Case of the Journal of Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22: 58–62.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael E. 1982. “Citation Ranking Versus Subjective Evaluation in the Determination of Journal Hierarchies in the Social Sciences.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 33: 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, David P. 1991. “Research Papers: Who's Uncited Now?” Science 251: 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laponce, Jean A. 1980. “Political Science: An Import-Export Analysis of Journals and Footnotes.” Political Studies 28: 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. 1990. “Using Footnotes to Trace the Evolution of Political Science from 1935 to 1989.” Canadian Political Science Association Bulletin 19: 4–7.Google Scholar
Lester, James P. 1990. “Evaluating the Evaluators: Accrediting Knowledge and the Ranking of Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 23: 445–47.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, S. J. and Palmer, J. P. 1984. “Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature 22: 77–88.Google Scholar
Lynn, Naomi B. 1983. “Self-Portrait: Profile of Political Scientists.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Finifter, Ada W. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, C. C. 1975. “The Relative Quality of Economics Journals Revisited.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 15: 91–97.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., Adolino, Jessica R., and McGuire, Kevin T. 1989. “Continuities in Political Research: Evidence from the APSR Since the 1960s.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22: 866–78.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., Bailey, Michael S., Martinez, Valerie J., and Angel, Susan C. 1987. “Report of the Managing Editor of the American Political Science Review, 1986–87.” PS: Political Science & Politics 20: 1007–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., Poe, Steven C., and Borrelli, Stephen A. 1986. “Report of the Managing Editor of the American Political Science Review, 1985–86.” PS: Political Science & Politics 19: 974–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., Ripley, Brian D., and Trish, Barbara. 1988. “The American Political Science Review: A Retrospective of Last Year and the Last Eight Decades.” PS: Political Science & Politics 21: 908–25.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C. and Smithey, Shannon K. 1990. “Monitoring Scholarly Journal Publication in Political Science: The Role of the APSR.” PS: Political Science & Politics 23: 647–56.Google Scholar
Roche, T. and Smith, D. L. 1978. “Frequency of Citations as a Criterion for the Rankings of Departments, Journals, and Individuals.” Sociological Inquiry 48: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J. Philippe and Roediger, Henry L. 1978. “An Evaluation of 80 Psychology Journals Based on the Science Citation Index.” American Psychologist 33: 520–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, John C. 1983. “Perceived Quality and Citation Rates of Education Journals.” Research in Higher Education 19: 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, Clement Y. K. 1988. “Citation Patterns of Core Communication Journals.” Human Communication Research 15: 236–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somit, Albert and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1967. The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
White, Murray J. and White, K. Geoffrey. 1977. “Citation Analysis of Psychology Journals.” American Psychologist 32: 301–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar