Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:38:25.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Americans Responded: A Study of Public Reactions to 9/11/01

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2002

Michael Traugott
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Ted Brader
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Deborah Coral
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Richard Curtin
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
David Featherman
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Robert Groves
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Martha Hill
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
James Jackson
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Thomas Juster
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Robert Kahn
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Courtney Kennedy
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Donald Kinder
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Beth-Ellen Pennell
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Matthew Shapiro
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Mark Tessler
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
David Weir
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Robert Willis
Affiliation:
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan

Abstract

On the afternoon of Tuesday, September 11, 2001, a group of social scientists at the Institute for Social Research (ISR) gathered to consider how they might employ their talents to help the country after the shocking events of that morning. The group included economists, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, demographers, and survey methodologists. Based upon their previous research experience, each of them proposed hypotheses on aspects of American life and individuals' morale and behavior that were most likely to be affected. While they were relatively confident about expected relationships in the short term, we were uncertain about how temporary or permanent these changes might be or how intertwined and mutually reinforcing they could become.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Copyright
© 2002 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)