Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:53:52.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government-Corroborated Conspiracies: Motivating Response to (and Belief in) a Coordinated Crime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2019

Brian Robert Calfano Open the ORCID record for Brian Robert Calfano [Opens in a new window]
Brian Robert Calfano*
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Accusations of conspiracy are nothing new in American politics, but examples in which the government—usually cast as a key player in conspiracy theories—goes on record to corroborate that a conspiracy occurred are rare. I leveraged an experiment that randomly exposes both college-student and general-public subject pools to information about the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassination report of a probable conspiracy in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. I find that those exposed to government corroboration of a conspiracy (1) are more prone to anger in response to the government report; (2) engage in an increased search of available media information about the assassination; and (3) are more likely to agree with the conclusion of a conspiracy in Kennedy’s murder. Implications for additional research about government pronouncements on controversial issues and follow-on public reaction also are discussed.

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 64 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allcott, Hunt, and Gentzkow, Matthew. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31: 1–28.10.1257/jep.31.2.211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Sheryl Thorburn, and Bogart, Laura M.. 2005. “Conspiracy Beliefs about HIV/AIDS and Birth Control among African Americans: Implications for the Prevention of HIV, Other STIs, and Unintended Pregnancy.” Journal of Social Issues 61: 109–26.10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00396.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, Lisa D., Koopman, Cheryl, and Zimbardo, Philip G.. 1995. “The Psychological Impact of Viewing the Film JFK: Emotions, Beliefs, and Political Behavioral Items.” Political Psychology 16: 237–57.10.2307/3791831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, James W. 2010. JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Fenster, Mark. 2008. Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Fetzer, James H. (ed.). 2003. The Great Zapruder Film Hoax: Deceit and Deception in the Death of JFK. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Calfano, Brian R., and Aronow, Peter. 2014. “Field Experimental Designs for the Study of Media Effects.” Political Communication 31: 168–80.10.1080/10584609.2013.828142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groden, Robert J. 1993. The Killing of a President: The Complete Photographic Record of the JFK Assassination, the Conspiracy, and the Cover-Up. New York: Viking Studio Books.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., Saunders, Kyle L., and Farhart, Christina E.. 2016. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust.” American Journal of Political Science 60: 824–44.10.1111/ajps.12234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Mike. 2011. Act of Treason: The Role of J. Edgar Hoover in the Assassination of President Kennedy. New York: Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32: 303–30.10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric, and Wood, Thomas J.. 2014. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 58: 952–66.10.1111/ajps.12084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stempel, Carl, Hargrove, Thomas, and Stempel, Guido H.. 2007. “Media Use, Social Structure, and Belief in 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 84: 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, Anthony. 1980. Conspiracy. New York: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Useem, Bert, and Useem, Michael. 1979. “Government Legitimacy and Political Stability.” Social Forces 57: 840–52.10.2307/2577357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Calfano supplementary material

Calfano supplementary material

Download Calfano supplementary material(File)
File 770.8 KB