Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:11:10.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government Statistics and Conflicting Explanations of Nonvoting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Frances Fox Piven  and
Richard A. Cloward
Frances Fox Piven
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Richard A. Cloward
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When turnout fell to a near-historic low in 1988, the two sources of government statistics suggested opposite reasons. One is that fewer and fewer people are registered to vote, and the other that registered voters are going to the polls less and less.

According to the figures supplied by state election officials who tally up county registration totals and record election returns, voting by registered voters is down 15 percentage points since 1960: 85.4% voted that year, but only 70.5% in 1988. By contrast, the U.S. Census reported that 86.2% of registered voters cast ballots in 1988, down only 4.8 percentage points since 1968 (when the Census postelection sample surveys of both registration and voting were first undertaken) (U.S. Bureau of Census, 1989). The 1988 result confirmed the earlier Census summary conclusion for the presidential elections between 1968-80 that registered voters “overwhelmingly go to the polls” (U.S. Bureau of Census, 1984a).

The Census surveys show that falling registration is the more important cause of declining turnout: the level slipped from 74.3% in 1968 to 66.6% in 1988, or 7.7 percentage points. Adjusting that result downward by about 10% to correct for the tendency by some respondents to tell the Census interviewers they are registered when they are not, the 1988 level of registration was 59%. State data, by contrast, show a much higher registration level: 70.9% in 1988, off only 4.5 percentage points since 1960.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 580 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burnham, Walter Dean. 1985. “The 1984 Election and the Future of American Politics.” In Election 1984: Landslide Without a Mandate? eds., Sandoz, Ellis and Crabb, Cecil V. Jr., New York: New American Library/Mentor Books.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., and McCue, Ken. 1985. “Do Registration Drives Matter?” Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, August 29-September 1.Google Scholar
Committee for the Study of the American Electorate. November 14, 1988.Google Scholar
Peverill, Squire, Glass, David P. and Wolfinger, Raymond E. 1984. “Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout.” Paper presented at conference, Where Have All the Voters Gone? University of Chicago. (Subsequently published in the American Political Science Review, 81, 1: March 1987.)Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Reports. 1984a. Voting and Registration Highlights From the Current Population Survey: 1964 to 1980. Series P-20, No. 131, February.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports. 1984b. Registration and Voting in the Election of November 1984. Series P-20, No. 405.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports. 1989. Registration and Voting in the Election of November 1988. (Advanced Report). Series P-20, No. 435, February.Google Scholar