Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:29:22.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Good, the Better, and the Best in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Michael J. Ballard  and
Neil J. Mitchell
Michael J. Ballard
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Neil J. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 826 - 828
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

References

American Political Science Association. 1986. 1992. 1995. Graduate Faculty and Programs in Political Science. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Garand, James C. 1990. “An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 23(September): 448–51.Google Scholar
Jackman, Robert W., and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1996. “Rating the Rating: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29(June): 155–60.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S., and Eagles, Munroe. 1996. “Ranking Political Science Programs: A View from the Lower Half.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29(June): 149–54.Google Scholar
Lowery, Robert C., and Silver, Brian D.. 1996. “A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Political Science Department Reputation and the Reputation of the University.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29(June): 161–67.Google Scholar
McCormick, James M., and Bernick, E. Lee. 1982. “Graduate Training and Productivity: A Look at Who Publishes.” Journal of Politics 44(February): 212–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Tien, Charles, and Peebler, Andrew A. 1996. “Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29(December): 704–17.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1995. Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R. 1983. “What Do the New Ratings of Political Science Departments Measure?” PS: Political Science and Politics 16(September): 532–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar