Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:33:47.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Representation in the American Politics Canon: An Analysis of Core Graduate Syllabi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2018

Sean M. Diament ,
Adam J. Howat  and
Matthew J. Lacombe
Sean M. Diament
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Adam J. Howat
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Matthew J. Lacombe
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core graduate-level seminars, in many ways, establish the “canon” literature for scholars entering a discipline. In the study of American Politics, the contents of this canon vary widely across departments and instructors, with important implications for the perspectives to which graduate students are exposed. At a basic level, the demographic characteristics of the authors whose work is assigned can have a major impact on the diversity (or lack of diversity) of viewpoints presented in these introductory courses. Using a unique dataset derived from a survey of core American Politics graduate seminars at highly-ranked universities, this project assesses the gender diversity of the authors whose research is currently taught—overall and within a comprehensive list of topics and subtopics. We also assess the “substantive representation” of women (and other underrepresented groups) within the American Politics canon by examining the frequency with which gender, racial, and other forms of identity politics are taught in these introductory courses.

Type
Articles
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 635 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Political Science Association. 2011. Report of the Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Emily, Boydstun, Amber E., Brown, Nadia E., Dionne, Kim Yi, Gillespie, Andra, Klar, Samara, et al. 2017. “Women Also Know Stuff: Meta-Level Mentoring to Battle Gender Bias in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (3): 779–83.Google Scholar
Breuning, Marijke, and Sanders, Kathryn. 2007. “Gender and Journal Authorship in Prestigious Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (2): 347–51.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2013. “A Hidden Curriculum? Examining the Gender Content in Introductory-Level Political Science Textbooks.” Politics and Gender 9 (2): 214–23.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., Bos, Angela L., and Duncan, Lauren E.. 2012. “Integrating Gender into the Political Science Core Curriculum.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (2): 238–43.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., Bos, Angela L., and Schneider, Monica C.. 2014. “Whose American Government? A Quantitative Analysis of Gender and Authorship in American Politics Texts.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diament, Sean M., Howat, Adam J., and Lacombe, Matthew J.. 2017. “What Is the ‘Canon’ in American Politics? Analyses of Core Graduate Syllabi.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (3): 256–78.Google Scholar
Evans, Heather K., and Moulder, A.. 2011. “Reflecting on a Decade of Women’s Publications in Four Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4): 793–8.Google Scholar
Gruberg, Martin. 2006. “Participation by Women in the 2005 APSA Annual Meeting.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (1): 111–12.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1992. “The State in Political Science: How We Become What We Study.” American Political Science Review 86 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Natalie, Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, Scott L.. 2007. “Ranking Departments: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (3): 531–7.Google Scholar
Mathews, Lanethea, and Anderson, Kristi. 2001. “A Gender Gap in Publishing? Women’s Representation in Edited Political Science Books.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (1): 143–7.Google Scholar
McClerking, Harwood K., and Philpot, Tasha S.. 2008. “Struggling to Be Noticed: The Civil Rights Movement as an Academic Agenda Setter.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 813–17.Google Scholar
Olivo, Christiane. 2012. “Bringing Women In: Gender and American Government and Politics Textbooks.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (2): 131–46.Google Scholar
Parenti, Michael. 2006. “Patricians, Professionals, and Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 499–505.Google Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 433–47.Google Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, and Carroll, Susan J.. 2006. “‘Far from Ideal’: The Gender Politics of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 507–13.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John C. 1991. “Liberal Learning and the Political Science Major: A Report to the Profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (1): 48–60.Google Scholar
Young, Cheryl D. 1995. “An Assessment of Articles Published by Women in 15 Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28 (3): 525–33.Google Scholar