Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:13:49.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Future of Election Forecasting: More Data, Better Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Drew A. Linzer*
Affiliation:
Emory University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: US Presidential Election Forecasting
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, Tom. 2012. “The Poll Quants Won the Election.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/the-poll-quants-won-the-election/31722.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Mark. 2012. “2012 Poll Accuracy: After Obama, Models and Survey Science Won the Day.” The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/2012-poll-accuracy-obama-models-survey_n_2087117.html.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2001. “The Referendum that Didn’t Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 34 (1): 3338.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2008. “Editor’s Introduction: Forecasting the 2008 National Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 679–82.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2012. “Forecasting the 2012 American National Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (4): 610–13.Google Scholar
Cassidy, John. 2012. “Cassidy’s Count: A Victory for the Pollsters and the Forecasters.” The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/11/cassidys-count-how-obama-won-how-romney-lost.html.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Rebecca. 2012. “The Best and Worst Pundit Predictors of 2012.” The Atlantic Wire. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/11/best-and-worst-pundit-predictors-2012/58846.Google Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. 2010. “Nudge the Vote.” The New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/magazine/31politics-t.html.Google Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. 2012. “How President Obamas Campaign Used Big Data to Rally Individual Voters.” MIT Technology Review http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/509026/how-obamas-team-used-big-data-to-rally-voters.Google Scholar
Issenberg, Sasha. 2013. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Noah, Park, David K. and Gelman, Andrew. 2012. “Understanding Persuasion and Activation in Presidential Campaigns: The Random Walk and Mean Reversion Models.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 42 (4): 843–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl E. 2009. “Forecasting Congressional Elections.” Extension of Remarks; Newsletter of the APSA Legislative Studies Section.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, Benjamin E., and Linzer, Drew A.. 2013. “Under-performing, Over-performing, or Just Performing? The Limitations of Fundamentals-based Presidential Election Forecasting.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183219.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1984. “Forecasting U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (3): 475–86.Google Scholar
Linzer, Drew A. 2013. “Dynamic Bayesian Forecasting of Presidential Elections in the States.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 108 (501): 124–34.Google Scholar
Marketplace. 2012. “Post-election, a Polling Conundrum: Interview with Frank Newport.”http://www.marketplace.org/topics/elections/attitude-check/post-election-polling-conundrum.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jacob M., Hollenbach, Florian M., and Ward, Michael D.. 2012. “Ensemble Predictions of the 2012 US Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (4): 651–54.Google Scholar
Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Martin. 1994. “The VP-function: A survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years.” Public Choice 79 (3–4): 213–45.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2012. “Pundits versus Probabilities; The Misguided Backlash against Nate Silver.” Columbia Journalism Review. http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/pundits_versus_probabilities.php.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1987. “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.” The American Economic Review 77 (2): 293297.Google Scholar
Scherer, Michael. 2012. “Inside the Secret World of the Data Crunchers Who Helped Obama Win.” Time: Swampland. http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/inside-the-secret-world-of-quants-and-data-crunchers-who-helped-obama-win.Google Scholar
Silver, Nate. 2012. “Methodology.” FiveThirtyEight. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/methodology.Google Scholar
Economist, The. 2012. “Politics and Statistics; March of the Nerds.”http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/11/politics-and-statistics.Google Scholar
Ward, Jon. 2013. “Republican National Committee Hires Senior Facebook Engineer As Chief Technology Officer.” The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/04/republican-national-commi_n_3386575.html.Google Scholar
Wilner, Elizabeth. 2013a. “The Cook Political Report ‘Big Data At-A-Glance’.” The Cook Political Report. http://cookpolitical.com/story/5804.Google Scholar
Wilner, Elizabeth. 2013b. “The Survey Monkey on Our Back: Where Our Addiction to Polls May Take Us.” The Cook Political Report. http://cookpolitical.com/story/5777.Google Scholar