Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:06:43.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feminism vs. Family Values: Women at the 1992 Democratic and Republican Conventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Extract

The 1992 conventions of the Democratic and Republican Parties saw the culmination of trends that have been developing for 20 years. The two major political parties have now completely polarized around feminism and the reaction to it. Each party's position has become institutionalized to the point where it is not seriously questioned within the national party and where the differences are clearly evident to the voting public. On feminist issues and concerns the parties are not following the traditional pattern of presenting different versions of the same thing, or following each other's lead into new territory. They are presenting two different and conflicting visions of how Americans should engage in everyday life.

Although the party platforms and the speeches at the conventions devoted many words to many issues, each party's vision can be summed up in a slogan. The Republicans articulated theirs clearly in the phrase “family values.” While their platform does not define this slogan, both the document and the speeches indicate that it stands for programs and policies that strengthen the traditional two-parent, patriarchal family in which the husband is the bread-winner, the wife is the caretaker, and children are completely subject to parental authority. The Democrats attempted their usual strategy of pre-emption and co-optation by borrowing the Republican's phrase to use in a different context, but their very use of it belied its content. In reality the Democrats have incorporated the feminist demand that “the personal is political” and have put on the public agenda issues that were once deemed to be purely personal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author thanks the following people for helping her cover the 1992 conventions: Nedda Allbray, Willem Bouwer, Katya Williams, Shauna Martin, Kathleen Knight, and Duane Oldfield.

References

The Boston Globe. 19 May 1992.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Frederick. 1992. “Inside the Covert Coalition.” Church & State. November.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1986. “Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3) (Fall): 327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Legal Times. 16 March 1992.Google Scholar
National Journal Convention Daily. 14 July 1992, 15 July 1992.Google Scholar
National NOW Times. August 1992.Google Scholar
The New York Times. 27 May 1992, 15 July 1992, 2 August 1992.Google Scholar
Oldfield, Duane. 1990. “The Right and the Righteous.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W., and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1984. Presidential Elections, 6th ed. New York: Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 1971. Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron. 1985. “The New Cultural Politics,” PS (Spring 18(2): 221–31.Google Scholar
The Wall Street Journal. 5 November 1991.Google Scholar
The Washington Post. 1992. “The GOP's Abortion-Rights Upstart,” 4 April.Google Scholar
The Washington Post. 10 September 1992.Google Scholar