Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-16T12:20:01.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Equalizing Effect of the Internet on Access to Research Expertise inPolitical Science and Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

Daniel M. Butler ,
Richard J. Butler  and
Jesse T. Rich
Daniel M. Butler
Affiliation:
Yale University
Richard J. Butler
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Jesse T. Rich
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent research shows that the Internet, by sharply reducing the real costs of sharinginformation, has profoundly impacted collaboration between faculty in different departments.Using information on spatial-temporal Bitnet connections, Agrawal and Goldfarb (2006) find that Internet connectivity increasedcollaboration between those connected universities by 85%. Extensively analyzing facultyproductivity at the top 25 universities during the last three decades, Kim, Morse, andZingales (2006) report that the Internet hassignificantly lowered department-specific research externalities in economics and finance bygiving those outside of top schools access to productive research colleagues within topschools. Concomitant with this decline in location-specific externalities, they also reportthat salaries at those top universities have increased since the universities are less ableto appropriate any rent based on research productivity created by physically being locatedat that university. One of the reasons that physical location is less important is e-mail.Walsh and Maloney (2003), using information fromfour fields (experimental biology, mathematics, physics, and sociology), find that e-mailhas significantly reduced coordination problems in research collaboration.

Type
The Profession
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 579 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agrawal, Ajay, and Goldfarb, Avi. 2006. “Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Information.” Unpublished draft, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul D. 2005. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data. Carey, N.C.: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Gary. 1980. “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 47 (January): 225–38.Google Scholar
De Maio, Gerald, and Kushner, Harvey W.. 1981. “Quantification and Multiple Authorships in Political Science.” Journal of Politics 43 (1): 181–93.Google Scholar
Figlio, David. 1994. “Trends in the Publication of Empirical Economics.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (3): 179–87.Google Scholar
Fisher, Bonnie S., Cobane, Craig T., Vander Ven, Thomas M, and Cullen, Francis T.. 1998. “How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (December): 847–56.Google Scholar
Garand, James C., and Giles, Micheal W.. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (April): 293–308.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Patterson, David, and Mizell, Francie. 1989. “Discretion in Editorial Decision-Making: The Case of the Journal of Politics.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22 (March): 58–62.Google Scholar
Kim, E. Han, Morse, Adair, and Zingales, Luigi. 2006. “Are Elite Universities Losing Their Competitive Edge?” Unpublished draft, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Malouin, Jean-Louis, and Outreville, J.-Francois. 1987. “The Relative Impact of Economics Journals: A Cross-country Survey and Comparison.” Journal of Economics and Business 39 (August): 267–77.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Economic Research. 1990–2005. Working papers series on area codes D8 (Information and Uncertainty), G2 (Financial Institutions and Uncertainty), and J3 (Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs). http://www.nber.org/papers/.Google Scholar
Walsh, John P., and Maloney, Nancy G.. 2003. “Problems in Scientific Collaboration: Does Email Hinder or Help?” Unpublished draft, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar