Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:24:32.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Considerations and the 2008 Presidential Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2009

Thomas M. Holbrook
Thomas M. Holbrook
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The idea that economic conditions influence election outcomes and voting behavior is hardly novel and would appear to be close to uniformly accepted, especially in the case of American presidential elections. Beginning with the early aggregate studies (Arcelus and Meltzer 1975; Bloom and Price 1975; Kramer 1971; Tufte 1978) and the important individual-level work that followed soon thereafter (Kiewiet 1983; Kinder and Kiewiet 1979, 1981; Fiorina 1981), election scholars have devoted considerable attention to the influence of the economy on voting behavior and election outcomes. Although the findings are many and sometimes disparate, a few general conclusions have emerged: economic voting is incumbency oriented rather than policy oriented (Fiorina 1981; Kiewiet 1983); at the individual level, evaluations of the national economy are more closely tied to vote choice than are evaluations of personal finances (Kiewiet 1983; Kinder and Kiewiet 1979, 1981; Kinder, Adams, and Gronke 1989); and, with the exception of 2000, the incumbent party is habitually returned to office when economic times are good and tossed out when economic times are bad (Campbell and Garand 2000). In short, we know a lot about how the economy influences voters and elections, and it would seem that there are few issues left to resolve.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 473 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2008. “Forecasting the 2008 Presidential Election with the Time-for-Change Model.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (October): 691–95.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcelus, F., and Meltzer, A. H.. 1975. “The effects of Aggregate Economic Variables on Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 69: 1232–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Harold, and Price, D.. 1975. “Voter Response to Short-run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession.” American Political Science Review 69: 124–54.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2008. “The Trial-Heat Forecast of the 2008 Presidential Vote: Performance and Value Considerations in an Open-Seat Election” PS: Political Science and Politics 41: 697–701.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E., and Garand, James. 2000. Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Delli-Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1997. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C., Mitchell, William, and Welch, Reed. 1995. “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Significance of Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 108–34.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters' National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 372–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2001. “Forecasting with Mixed Economic Signals: A Cautionary Tale.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 39–44.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2008. “Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2008 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41: 709–12.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald, Adams, Gordon S., and Gronke, Paul W.. 1989. “Economics and Politics in the 1984 American Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald, and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments on Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald, and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Voting: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald, and Sanders, Lynne. 1996. Divided by Color. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65: 131–43.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Election Outcomes.” In Annual Review of Political Science, ed. Polsby, Nelson. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Miller, Joanne M, and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1998. “The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2001. “National Economic Voting in US Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 63: 159–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Niemi, Richard G., Fan, David P., and Amato, Timothy. 1999. “Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval.” Journal of Politics 61: 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91: 567–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel. 1994. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Dhavan V., Watts, Mark D., Domke, David, Fan, David.P., and Fibison, Michael. 1999. “News Coverage, Economic Cues, and the Public's Presidential Preferences, 1984–1996.” Journal of Politics 61: 914–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., and White, Ismail K.. 2002. “Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns” American Political Science Review 96: 75–90.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions Versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar