Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:54:40.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

E. E. Schattschneider and the Responsible Party Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

John Kenneth White
John Kenneth White*
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Shortly before his death in 1971 E. E. Schattschneider said, “I suppose the most important thing I have done in my field is that I have talked longer and harder and more persistently and enthusiastically about political parties than anyone else alive.” Schattschneider's claim is not boastful, but factual. Exactly fifty years ago he completed Party Government, a book that remains a “must” read for students of the U.S. party system. But Schattschneider did more than write books. As Chairman of the APSA-sanctioned Committee on Political Parties, he presided over a debate that resulted in the seminal report, Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. Like Party Government, this also is a “must” read. Evron Kirkpatrick proclaimed it “a landmark in the history of political science as policy science” (1971). Clinton Rossiter said he would “recommend it … to all who are interested in moving toward stronger party government” (1960). Theodore J. Lowi ranked the Schattschneider committee report as “second only to the 1937 President's Committee on Administrative Management as a contribution by academics to public discourse on the fundamentals of American democracy” (1985). William Crotty believed it exercised “the most significant influence on the debate over the operation of political parties that occurred between the Progressive period and the party reform movement of the 1970s” (1980).

The responsible party model has had a long life in part because of the passionate arguments Schattschneider made on its behalf.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 167 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamany, David. 1975. “Introduction.” In The Semi-Sovereign People, Schattschneider, E. E.. Hinsdale, IL: Rinehart and Company.Google Scholar
Barone, Michael. 1990. Our Country: From Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor. 1991. “The Rise and Fall of Parties.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor. 1963. The Deadlock of Democracy: Four-Party Politics in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Committee on Political Parties. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System.” American Political Science Review XLIV: 3, 2.Google Scholar
Crotty, William J. 1980. “The Philosophies of Party Reform.” In Party Renewal in America, ed. Pomper, Gerald M.. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Leon D. 1986. Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Formisano, Ronald P. 1983. The Transformation of Political Culture: Massachusetts Parties, 1790s–1840s. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, A. G., ed. 1914. The Challenge of Facts and Other Essays. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1985. The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, M. I. 1910. Democracy and the Party System in the United States. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M., ed. 1980. Party Renewal in America. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 1984. Bringing Back the Parties. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1954. The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origins and Present State. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton. 1960. Parties and Politics in America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1945. “Party Government and Employment Policy.” American Political Science Review, December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1948. The Struggle for Party Government. College Park: The University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1969. Two Hundred Million Americans in Search of a Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur M. 1960. Kennedy or Nixon: Does It Make Any Difference? New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar