Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T12:53:31.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disciplines that Forget: Political Science and Ethnography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Edward Schatz
Edward Schatz*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Ethnography and Participant Observation: Political Science Research in this “Late Methodological Moment”
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 135 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bayard de Volo, Lorraine and Schatz, Edward. 2004. “From the Inside Out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (2): 267–71.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard E. Jr. 1990. Watching Politicians: Essays on Participant Observation. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies.Google Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2012. “Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 717–23.Google Scholar
Goffman, Alice. 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving and Lofland, Lyn H.. 1989. “On Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18 (2): 123–32.Google Scholar
Herrera, Yoshiko M. and Kapur, Devesh. 2007. “Improving Data Quality: Actors, Incentives, and Capabilities.” Political Analysis 15 (4): 365–86.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1996. “The Data Puzzle: The Nature of Interpretation in Quantitative Research.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, Edward E. 1983. “Let’s Take the Con Out of Econometrics.” The American Economic Review 73 (1): 31–43.Google Scholar
Majic, Samantha. 2013. Sex Work Politics: From Protest to Service Provision. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Monroe, Kristen R. 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. London and New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzche, Friedrich. 1996. Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits. Trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pachirat, Timothy. 2011. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernst. 1990. “What is a Nation?” trans. Thom, M., in Nation and Narration, edited by Bhabha, H. K.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Trans. Savage, Denis. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato. 1986. “From the Door of His Tent: the Fieldworker and the Inquisitor.” In Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, edited by James, Clifford and Marcus, George E., 77–97. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward, ed. 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine and Yanow, Dvora. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. 2010. “Rethinking Rules: Creativity and Constraint in the House of Representatives.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 168–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2009. Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2010. “Reflections on Ethnographic Work in Political Science,” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 255–272.Google Scholar