Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:31:09.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Diffusion of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in the US Senate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Sean M. Theriault
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Herschel F. Thomas III
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

Advocates for same-sex marriage have had much to celebrate. The last few years have shown that state after state and senator after senator have declared their support for full marriage equality. Such momentum suggests that their goals will be realized sooner rather than later. In this article, we analyze when senators announce their support for same-sex marriage. Contrary to the popularly held belief that their decisions will quickly snowball into filibuster-proof numbers, we find that most of the easy successes have already been achieved. The difficulty of securing the last few votes may take much longer.

Type
Features
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amira, D. 2013. “Mary Landrieu Supports Gay Marriage in the Only Way That Matters.” New York Magazine. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/04/mary-landrieu-gay-marriage-support.html.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., and Leech, B. L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, F. J. 2006. “The Influence of Unobserved Factors on Position Timing and Content in the NAFTA Vote.” Political Analysis 14(4): 421–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Arnold, L. W., and Zorn, C. J. W.. 1997. “The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement.” American Political Science Review 91(2): 324–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, J., and Jones, B. S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, T., and Theriault, S. M.. 2012. “The Strategic Timing behind Position-taking in the US Congress: A Study of Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 18(1): 4162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, S. 2013. 113th Senate Ideal Points. http://jackman.stanford.edu/blog/?p=2676.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, K. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maass, A., 1983. Congress and the Common Good. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maskett, S. 2013. “Same-sex Marriage: Did Jewish Senators Lead the Way?Washington Monthly. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ten-miles-square/2013/07/samesex_marriage_did_jewish_se046129.php Google Scholar
Matthews, D. 2013. “In 2011, Only 15 Senators Backed Same-sex Marriage. Now 49 Do.” UPDATE: Now 51!The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/04/02/in-2011-only-15-senators-backed-same-sex-marriage-now-49-do/ Google Scholar
Pearson-Merkowitz, S. and McTague, J. 2013. “Same-Sex Marriage and the Liberalizing Effect of the Jewish Faith on the Democratic Party.” Pacific Standard. http://www.psmag.com/politics/jews-and-the-changing-nature-of-same-sex-marriage-63401/.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations (5th Ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B. 1982. Congressional Realignment. Austin: University of Texas Press, 19251978.Google Scholar