Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:59:00.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conditional Surrender: Charles de Gaulle and American Opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Theodore J. Lowi
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Martin A. Schain
Affiliation:
New York University

Extract

It is an enduring myth that heads of state and other international leaders are often more admired abroad than at home. The prophet is not without honor, save in his own country. It has been argued, for example, that Richard Nixon's popularity in other countries continued to grow during the Watergate crisis almost in inverse proportion to its decline in the United States. In fact, there has been no systematic study of the popularity of political leaders outside of their own countries. The little evidence that exists suggests that, although important leaders are often admired by foreign political elites when they are unpopular at home, the reaction of mass publics is less clear. Thus, European political leaders were often sympathetic to the plight of Richard Nixon as the Watergate affair evolved between 1973 and 1975, but mass public opinion was far more negative.

Charles de Gaulle did not fit the pattern, at least not in the United States. His 30 years of world prominence, 1940-70, may have produced a roller-coaster pattern of popularity in France, but the limited data we have indicate that in the United States, he became increasingly unpopular as he consolidated his power during the Fifth Republic, and, in the process, challenged the “hegemony” of the United States. Among American political elites, he seems to have been consistently unpopular, and revisions in that assessment were not to come before his second retreat to Colombey in 1969.

On the centenary of de Gaulle's birth (and the 20th anniversary of his death), we undertook a reevaluation of the current public status of de Gaulle in America through a survey of a select group of opinion leaders whose preoccupations would enable them to form considered judgments about him as a political leader, and whose judgments would be transmitted to succeeding generations of university students.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheson, Dean. 1969. Present at the Creation. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Aglio, Raoul. 1990. “Les ennemis du general de Gaulle aux Etats Unis.” Presented at the conference on “De Gaulle et son siecle,” Paris.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, eds. 1958. From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalb, Marvin and Kalb, Bernard. 1974. Kissinger. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Lyon, Peter. 1974. Eisenhower: Portrait of the Hero. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur Jr., 1974. The Imperial Presidency. New York: Popular Library.Google Scholar
Sofres, . 1990. De Gaulle en son siecle. Montrouge: Sofres.Google Scholar