Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:03:36.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Edward B. Portis
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Journal of Politics
Jon R. Bond
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, Journal of Politics

Extract

Having discussed this issue at three meetings of our editorial board, we were already familiar with most of the arguments presented in the thoughtful essays by Gary King and Paul Herrnson. We can confirm Herrnson's supposition that the proposed policy is controversial, and that the chief difficulty has to do with the relinquishing of what might be called intellectual property before its creators have fully exploited it. Although we have decided to wait until a thorough discussion of the issue is conducted under the auspices of the APSA before finally deciding on a policy, any statement we might require of authors as a condition of publication in The Journal of Politics is likely to fall considerably short of what King recommends.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Portis and Bond are co-editors of the Journal of Politics.

References

Note

1. Will Rogers explained the priority of discovery of error over confirmation: “It's not what we don't know that hurts; it's what we know that ain't so.”