No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Bugs in the NRC's Doctoral Program Evaluation Data: From Mites to Hissing Cockroaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- News
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998
References
“Departmental Rankings: Much Ado About Something?” 1996. PS: Political Science and Politics
28(June): 144–48.Google Scholar
Jackman, Robert W., and Siverson, Randolph M.
1996. “Rating the Rating: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs.” PS: Political Science and Politics
28(June): 155–60.Google Scholar
Katz Richard, S., and Eagles, Munroe. 1996. “Ranking Political Science Programs: A View from the Lower Half.” PS: Political Science and Politics
28(June): 149–54.Google Scholar
Lowery, Robert C., and Silver, Brian D.
1996. “A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Political Science Department Reputation and the Reputation of the University.” PS: Political Science and Politics
28(June): 161–67.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Tien, Charles, and Peebler, Andrew A.
1996. “Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach.” PS: Political Science and Politics
28(December): 704–17.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1995. Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. n.d. “Pub_cit.doc” <computer file>. On Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Data Set <CD-ROM>. Washington DC: National Academy Press..+On+Research+Doctorate+Programs+in+the+United+States:+Data+Set+.+Washington+DC:+National+Academy+Press.>Google Scholar
You have
Access