Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:25:45.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging Positivist and Interpretative Approaches through Annotation for Transparent Inquiry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Lindsay Mayka Open the ORCID record for Lindsay Mayka [Opens in a new window]
Lindsay Mayka*
Affiliation:
Colby College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI): Transparency in Practice in Qualitative and Multi-Method Research
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 479 - 482
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2009. “How to Tell an Axe Murderer: An Essay on Ethnography, Truth, and Lies.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, ed. Edward, Schatz 53–73. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Collier, David, and Seawright, Jason. 2004. “Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, ed. Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David 3–20. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gamson, William, Croteau, David, Hoynes, William, and Sasson, Theodore. 1992. “Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality.” Annual Review of Sociology 18:373–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2021. “Annotations to ATI.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S104909652100024X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2021. Data for: “The Power of Human Rights Frames in Urban Security: Lessons from Bogotá. Qualitative Data Repository.” https://doi.org/10.5064/F630E3UT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. Forthcoming. “The Power of Human Rights Frames in Urban Security: Lessons from Bogotá.” Comparative Politics.Google Scholar
Milonopoulos, Theo. 2021. “Annotating Without Anxiety: Achieving Adaptability, Accessibility, and Accountability Through ATI.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrick, Rachel. 2021. “Reflections on Using Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI) in Mixed-Methods Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2009. “Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, ed. Schatz, Edward 1–22. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Majic, Samantha. 2017. “Ethnography and Participant Observation: Political Science Research in This ‘Late Methodological Moment.’” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (1): 97–102.Google Scholar
Siewert, Markus Bjoern. 2021. “How Annotation for Transparent Inquiry Can Enhance Research Transparency in Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Erica, and Smith, Nicholas Rush. 2019. “The Case for Comparative Ethnography.” Comparative Politics 51 (3): 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 2012. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, third edition. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2010. “Reflections on Ethnographic Work in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 13:255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar