Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:36:10.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bottom Up Comparative Politics: Game Theory Abroad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Ruth Lane
Ruth Lane
Affiliation:
American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

If comparative politics is in one if its periodic states of theoretical collapse (Blyth 2006, 493), no one feels the lack of roof and walls more acutely than instructors in undergraduate comparative politics classes. With professional colleagues and graduate students one preaches to the choir, but with college students, many of whom may be non-majors, we must work in partibus infidelium, among those who have not yet been converted. Without an orthodox doctrine to work from, this can be a challenging task indeed. The approach used here, combining detailed socio-political narratives with strong analytic theory, tends to engage students because it fills in a full range of national life, rich in national eccentricities, cultural exaggerations, and hidden motives, and because it controls the proliferation of detail by emphasizing its logic. In a sense the abstract becomes concrete and the concrete becomes abstract.

Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 871 - 877
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Edwin A. 1992. Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Berkeley, Bill. 2001. The Graves Are Not Yet Full. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1991. Fragile Glory: A Portrait of France and the French. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2006. “Great Punctuations: Prediction, Randomness, and the Evolution of Comparative Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (November): 493–8.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sue E. S. 2007. “Will We Ruin Them for (Civic) Life? Analyzing the Impact of Teaching Rational Choice in Introductory Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (April): 387–91.Google Scholar
Davis, Morton D. 1997. Game Theory: A Nontechnical Introduction. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. [1947] 1980. Invisible Man. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1978. Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven, eds. 2006. Informal Institutions & Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hessler, Peter. 2001. River Town: Two Years on the Yangtze. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
Johnson, James. 1996. “How Not to Criticize Rational Choice Theory; Pathologies of ‘Common Sense.’” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (March): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1997. “Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81–112.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Ruth. 1997. The Art of Comparative Politics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Lane, Ruth. 2007. The Game of Justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert J. 1992. “Creating a Context for Game Theory.” In Toward a History of Game Theory: Annual Supplement to Volume 24 History of Political Economy, ed. Weintraub, E. Roy. Durham: Duke University Press, 29–76.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel. 1998. Microfoundations, Method, and Causation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian S., Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J.. 2004. “Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage it?” American Political Science Review 98 (May): 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Suketu. 2004. Maximum City: Bombay Lost and Found. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 2005. “Power and Political Institutions.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (June): 215–33.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. 1965. Utopia. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph. 1987. Democracy Italian Style. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Stephen, and Kinzer, Stephen. 1982. Bitter Fruit: The Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Schotter, Andrew. 1992. “Oskar Morgenstern's Contribution to the Development of the Theory of Games.” In Toward a History of Game Theory: Annual Supplement to Volume 24 History of Political Economy, ed. Weintraub, E. Roy. Durham: Duke University Press, 95–112.Google Scholar
Sciolino, Elaine. 2000. Persian Mirrors. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Smith, Patrick. 1997. Japan: A Reinterpretation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt Brace World.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1991. “The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing about Mechanisms in Social Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (September): 367–88.Google Scholar
Waldrop, Mitchell. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy, ed. 1992. Toward a History of Game Theory: Annual Supplement to Volume 24 History of Political Economy. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 2002. “Rational-Choice Institutionalism. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V.. New York: W. W. Norton and the American Political Science Association, 660–92.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S. 1997. “Reformulating Explanatory Standards and Advancing Theory in Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 277–310.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lane supplementary material

Syllabus 1

Download Lane supplementary material(File)
File 62.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Lane supplementary material

Syllabus 2

Download Lane supplementary material(File)
File 66 KB