Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T01:19:44.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF THE 2008 STATE AND DISTRICTFORECAST MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Carl E. Klarner
Carl E. Klarner
Affiliation:
Indiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The October 2008 issue of PS published a symposiumof presidential and congressional forecasts made in the summerleading up to the election. This article is an assessment of theaccuracy of their models.

Ninety-nine days before the elections I utilized national- anddistrict- or state-level information to forecast the 2008 U.S.presidential, House, and Senate elections (Klarner 2008). Overall,the presidential model performed very well, while the House andSenate models understated the extent of the Democratic wave.

Type
Forecasting Recap
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 23 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Klarner, Carl. 2008. “Forecasting the 2008 U.S. House, Senate, and Presidential Elections at the District and State Level.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (October): 723–8.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl E., and Buchanan, Stan. 2006a. “Forecasting the 2006 Elections for the United States Senate.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (October): 849–55.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl E., and Buchanan, Stan. 2006b. “Forecasting the 2006 Elections for the U.S. House of Representatives.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (October): 857–61.Google Scholar