Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:44:45.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Public Choice Scholars Different?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2004

Jac C. Heckelman  and
Robert Whaples
Jac C. Heckelman
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University
Robert Whaples
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
THE PROFESSION
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 2003 , pp. 797 - 799
Copyright
© 2003 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston Richard M. J. R. Kearl Michael B. Vaughan. 1992 Is There a Consensus Among Economists in the 1990s? American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 82 203-9Google Scholar
Cohn Jonathon 1999 Irrational Exuberance The New Republic 221 (October) 25 31 Google Scholar
Green Donald P. Ian Shapiro 1994 Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science New Haven Yale University Press Google Scholar
Grofman Bernard 1995 On the Gentle Art of Rational Choice Bashing Information, Participation & Choice Bernard Grofman Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press 239 242 Google Scholar
Mueller Dennis C. 1989 Public Choice II Cambridge Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Orchard Lionel Hugh Stretton 1997 Public Choice Cambridge Journal of Economics 21 409 430 Google Scholar