Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T12:29:46.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Intersectional Approach to Understanding Representation in State Legislatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2022

Christian Dyogi Phillips Open the ORCID record for Christian Dyogi Phillips [Opens in a new window]
Christian Dyogi Phillips*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research on Race and Ethnicity in Legislative Studies
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 292 - 294
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barreto, Matt, Segura, Gary M., and Woods, Nathan D.. 2004. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority-Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, Regina P. 2009. “The Importance of Race and Ethnicity in Congressional Primary Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 459–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nadia E. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Cathy J. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2014. “Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy-Fanta, Carol, Lien, Pei-te, Pinderhughes, Dianne, and Sierra, Christine Marie. 2016. Contested Transformation: Race, Gender, and Political Leadership in 21st-Century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenke, Eric Gonzalez. 2014. “Ignorance Is Bias: The Effect of Latino Losers on Models of Latino Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2015. “Female Candidates and Legislators.” Annual Review of Political Science 18 (1): 349–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Christian Dyogi. 2021. Nowhere to Run: Race, Gender, and Immigration in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Paru. 2014. “It Takes a Black Candidate: A Supply-Side Theory of Minority Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (2): 266–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smooth, Wendy. 2006. “Intersectionality in Electoral Politics: A Mess Worth Making.” Politics & Gender 2 (3): 400–414.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2006. “Do Interest Groups Represent the Disadvantaged? Advocacy at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender.” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 894–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takash, Paule Cruz. 1993. “Breaking Barriers to Representation: Chicana/Latina Elected Officials in California.” Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development 22 (3/4): 325–60.Google Scholar