Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:35:17.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Publishes in Comparative Politics? Studying the World from the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2007

Gerardo L. Munck  and
Richard Snyder
Gerardo L. Munck
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Richard Snyder
Affiliation:
Brown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Who publishes in the discipline's leading journals is a matter of intrinsic interest to political scientists. Indeed, any discipline is first and foremost about the people who practice it. A focus on who publishes also raises important questions concerning the relationship between the characteristics of authors, such as their gender, seniority, institutional affiliation, and nationality, and the knowledge they produce. Is who publishes associated with what is published? Moreover, publications in leading journals are an important marker of professional status and a key conduit for the diffusion of ideas. This points to a further question: Do the top journals differ in terms of the authors and research they publish?We are grateful to Angela Hawken for her advice on the construction of the data set, to Matthew Lieber for his assistance with data collection, and to PS's two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions.

Type
THE PROFESSION
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 339 - 346
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, William C., G. N. Griffiths, Robert Matthews, and Daniel Scherruble. 1976. “American Political Science before the Mirror: What our Journals Reveal about the Profession.” Journal of Politics 38 (November): 895–917.Google Scholar
De Maio, Gerald, and Harvey W. Kushner. 1981. “Quantification and Multiple Authorship in Political Science.” Journal of Politics 43 (February): 181–93.Google Scholar
Fisher, Bonnie S., Craig T. Cobane, Thomas M. Vander Ven, and Francis T. Cullen. 1998. “How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (December): 847–56.Google Scholar
Hull, Adrian Prentice. 1999. “Comparative Political Science: An Inventory and Assessment since the 1980's.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (March): 117–24.Google Scholar
McCormick, James M., and Tom W. Rice. 2001. “Graduate Training and Research Productivity in the 1990s: A Look at Who Publishes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (September): 675–80.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Richard Snyder. 2007. “Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (January): 5–31.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Richard Snyder. Forthcoming. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1995. Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997. “Towards a More Cosmopolitan Political Science?” European Journal of Political Research 31: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and George H. Gadbois. 1983. “Contemporary Comparative Politics: An Inventory and Assessment.” Comparative Political Studies 16 (October): 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. “Reflections on ‘Problem Selection’ in Comparative Politics.” In Arguing Comparative Politics, Alfred Stepan. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Wills, Garry. 2004. “Did Tocqueville ‘Get’ America?” New York Review of Books 51, April 29, 52–6.Google Scholar