Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:20:24.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vindicating Anthony Downs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2005

Mark M. Gray  and
A Wuffle
Mark M. Gray
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
A Wuffle
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Positive turnout rates in the United States and elsewhere are widely considered “an embarrassing limitation of the economic approach to politics” because, for any one voter, “the costs of casting a ballot in any large election are almost always greater than the potential benefits, which are dependent on the unlikely occurrence of casting the winning or tie vote in an election” (Knack 1992, 133). Green and Shapiro (1994), whose scathing critique of the rational choice field centers on the work of Anthony Downs (1957), trenchantly put it: “Rational choice theorists have trotted out an astonishing variety of conjectures about the costs and benefits of voting, in the process generating an enormous literature, possibly larger in terms of academic citations and sheer bibliographic length than any other rational choice literature in American politics” (47–48), yet they still have no answer as to why people vote when, according to their arguments, reason says they ought not. Grofman (1993), paraphrasing Morris Fiorina, has referred to the failure of rational choice theory to explain turnout as the “paradox that ate rational choice.”We are indebted to Clover Behrend-Gethard for bibliographic assistance.

Type
The Profession
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , October 2005 , pp. 737 - 740
Copyright
© 2005 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 246–278.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Boston: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brunk, Gregory C. 1980. “The Impact of Rational Participation Models on Voting Attitudes.” Public Choice 35: 549–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Phillip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Morris Fiorina. 1974. “The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis.” American Political Science Review 68: 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H., Thomas Gilovich, and Dennis T. Regan. 1993. “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno. 2005. “Letter to the Editor.” The Economist, March 5, 16.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark M., and Miki Caul. 2000. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies 33: 1091–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Mark M. 2003. “In the Midst of Fellows: The Social Context of the American Turnout Decision.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 1993. “Is Turnout the Paradox that Ate Rational Choice Theory?” In Information, Participation and Choice: ‘An Economic Theory of Democracy’ in Perspective, ed. Bernard Grofman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 93–103.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 1996. “Political Economy: Downsian Perspectives.” In New Handbook of Political Science, eds. Robert Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York and London: Oxford University Press, 691–701.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 2004. “Downs and Two-party Convergence.” In Annual Review of Political Science, ed. Nelson Polsby. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 25–46.Google Scholar
Hanks, Christopher, and Bernard Grofman. 1998. “Turnout in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Primary and General Elections in the South, 1922–90: A Rational Choice Model of the Effects of Short-run and Long-run Electoral Competition on Turnout.” Public Choice 94: 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckleman, Jac C., and Robert Whaples. 2003. “Are Public Choice Scholars Different?” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (4): 797–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinkner, Philip. 1993. “Dwarfing the Political Capacity of the People? The Relationship between Judicial Activism and Voter Turnout, 1840–1988.” Polity 25: 633–645.Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 1992. “Civic Norms, Social Sanctions, and Voter Turnout.” Rationality and Society 4: 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, John. 1984. “The Pure Theory of Large Two-Candidate Elections.” Public Choice 44: 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael P., and Samuel L. Popkin. 2001. “The Myth of the Vanishing Voter.” American Political Science Review 95: 963–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R., and Howard Rosenthal. 1983. “A Strategic Calculus of Voting.” Public Choice 31: 7–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William, and Peter Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62: 25–42.Google Scholar
Rosen, Hanna. 2004. “From Beantown to Bentown,” Washington Post, 27 July 2004, sec. C.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar