Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:19:29.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Uses and Abuses of Registration and Turnout Data: An Analysis of Piven and Cloward's Studies of Nonvoting in America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Stephen Earl Bennett*
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati

Extract

A large corpus exists detailing the reasons for low turnout in American elections. It is not surprising that scholars disagree over the factors responsible. What should concern us is the extent to which single-factor explanations lead to serious misunderstanding of this phenomenon.

Piven and Cloward recently continued their crusade to relax registration statutes (1989: see also 1988a, 1988b). They contend that the most important causes of low turnout are “legal-institutional” features of American politics, especially personal registration laws. They assert that American turnout is lower than in most western democracies and what it had been in this country during the late-nineteenth century because registration laws keep many people, particularly those in the lower social orders, from voting. Eliminate registration, or shift the burden from individual to government, and the low turnout problem will be solved, so Piven and Cloward argue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review, 76: 502521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Simon, Dennis H. 1986. “Turnout in American National Elections.” In Research in Micropolitics, ed. Long, Samuel. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1986. Apathy in America, 1960–1976. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Bennett, Linda L. M. 1986. “Political Participation.” In The Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 1, ed. Long, Samuel. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Resnick, David. Forthcoming. “The Implications of Non-voting for Democracy in America.” American Journal of Political Science, 34 (August, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1982. The Current Crisis in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1987a. “The Turnout Problem.” In Elections American Style, ed. Reichley, A. James. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1987b. “Elections as Democratic Institutions.” In Elections in America, ed. Schlozman, Kay Lehman. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. Personal Correspondence with the Author. December 4, 1989.Google Scholar
Committee for the Study of the American Electorate, n.d. “Non-Voter Study ‘85–86: Voter Registration 1984: A Report and Evaluation.” Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gans, Curtis B. 1978. “The Empty Ballot Box: Reflections on Nonvoters in America.” Public Opinion, 1 (4): 5457.Google Scholar
Gans, Curtis B. 1988. “Non-voting: The Nature of the Problem, Its Importance to American Democracy and Some Approaches to Its Solution.” In Media Technology and the Vote: A Sourcebook, ed. Swerdlow, Joel L.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gant, Michael M., and Lyons, William. 1988. “The Implications of Non-Voting for Democratic Theory.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hadley, Arthur T. 1978. The Empty Polling Booth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. 1982. Who Voted? The Dynamics of Electoral Turnout, 1870–1980. New York: Praeger Publications.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. 1987. Continuity and Change in Electoral Politics, 1893–1928. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles E., and Gosnell, Harold F. 1924. Non-Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peter D. Hart Research Associates. 1985. A Nationwide Survey of New Registrants. (Mimeographed).Google Scholar
Peter D. Hart Research Associates. n.d. Survey Highlights. (Mimeographed).Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A. 1988a. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1988b. “National Voter Registration Reform: How It Might Be Won.” PS, 21: 868875.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A. 1989. “Government Statistics and Conflicting Explanations of Nonvoting.” PS, 22: 580588.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review, 80: 1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. 1978. “The Effect of Registration Laws on Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review, 72: 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, Richard G. 1986. “Election Legislation: 1984–85.” The Book of the States: 1986–87. Vol. 26. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
Smolka, Richard G. 1988. “Election Legislation: 1986–87.” The Book of the States: 1988–89. Vol. 27. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1987. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1988. “Will the Real Nonvoter Please Stand Up?Public Opinion, 11 (2): 4144, 59.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1989. “Election '88: Registration and Turnout.” Public Opinion, 11 (5): 1213, 56–58.Google Scholar
Traugott, Michael W., and Katosh, John P. 1979. “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 43: 359377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1989. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 440. Voting and Registration in the Election of November 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar