Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:07:01.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Usage of Recursive in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Miles Townes
Miles Townes
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article discusses the term “recursive,” which has multiple uses in the political science literature. The two principle uses are reviewed, with attention to precedent and technical meanings, and examples are provided of mathematical concepts and their application to political science literature. The problem of divergent meaning is addressed through a survey of potential for reconciliation or possible substitute terminology.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 259 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, Hayward Jr. 1966. “The Long Road to International Relations Theory: Problems of Statistical Nonadditivity.” World Politics 18 (4): 623–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1954. “Logical Syntax and Semantics.” Language 30 (2): 230–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentzel, R., and Hansen, B.. 1954–1955. “On Recursiveness and Interdependency in Economic Models.” Review of Economic Studies 22 (3): 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. “Logical Syntax and Semantics: Their Linguistic Relevance.” Language 31 (1): 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William Roberts. 1998. “Agents and Structures: Two Views of Preferences, Two Views of Institutions.” International Studies Quarterly 42 (2): 245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmelman, Debra S. 1996. “Trial by Plea Bargain: Case Settlement as a Product of Recursive Decisionmaking.” Law & Society Review 30 (2): 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. Constitution of Society: An Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?” Science 298 (5598): 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopmann, P. Terrence. 1998. “Review: Complexity and Uncertainty in International Systems.” Mershon International Studies Review 42 (2): 313–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbroscio, David L. 1999. “Structure, Agency, and Democratic Theory.” Polity 32 (1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleene, S. C. 1935. “A Theory of Positive Integers in Formal Logic. Part II.” American Journal of Mathematics 57 (2): 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Powell, G. Bingham Jr., and Prewitt, Kenneth. 1969. “Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships, II.” American Political Science Review 63 (3): 808–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., and Lamb, W. Curtis. 1969. “Global Patterns of Diplomatic Exchange, 1963–64.” Journal of Peace Research 6 (1): 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 1977. “How to Succeed in Political Science by Being Very Trying: A Methodological Sampler.” PS: Political Science and Politics 10 (3): 302–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strotz, Robert H., and Wold, H. O. A.. 1960. “Recursive vs. Nonrecursive Systems: An Attempt at Synthesis (Part I of a Triptych on Causal Chain Systems).” Econometrica 28 (2): 417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (3): 335–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wold, H. 1954. “Causality and Econometrics.” Econometrica 22 (2): 162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar