Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:03:33.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulating the Free Trade Area of the Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2007

Bob Switky  and
William Avilés
Bob Switky
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska at Kearney
William Avilés
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska at Kearney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the early 1990s, North Americans have participated in a large political-economic experiment in a regional trade bloc called the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). With NAFTA now over 10 years old, the non-NAFTA countries have been debating the merits and shortcomings of creating an expanded version of the trade agreement that would encompass virtually every state in the Americas. The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) would encompass 34 western hemisphere countries, over 800 million consumers, and a total economy of over $12 trillion. The debate over the FTAA raises a long list of important practical questions for each of the potential member states and their citizens. The debate also raises a host of pedagogical questions for students of the entire region and beyond. This paper describes a student-based simulation that taps into those practical and pedagogical questions. As in other simulations, such as the Model United Nations, students role-play while vicariously experiencing the opportunities and constraints facing each country as they negotiate for policy preferences.

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 399 - 405
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAHE Bulletin. 1996. April, 7.Google Scholar
Bean, John C. 2001. Engaging Ideas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Cooper, J., P. Robinson, and D. Ball. 2003. Small Group Learning in Higher Education: Lessons from the Past, Visions of the Future. Oklahoma City: New Forums Press.Google Scholar
Duquette, Michel, and Maxime Rondeau. 2004. “ The Puzzle of Institutionalizing a Free Market Continental Zone: The Nuts and Bolts of the FTAA.” In Free Trade for the Americas? The United States' Push for the FTAA Agreement, eds. Paulo Vizentini and Marianne Wiesebron. London: Zed Books, 59–76.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. 2001. Research on Educational Innovations. Poughkeepsie, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary C., and Wong Yee. 2005. “Grading Growth: The Trade Legacy of President Bush.” Harvard International Review 26 (July 20). http://hir.harvard.edu/articles/1273/.Google Scholar
Marsh, Christopher, and James Cole Bucy. 2002. “Negotiating Russian Federalism: A Simulation for Comparative Politics.” International Studies Perspectives 3: 373–83.Google Scholar
McKeachie, W. 2002. Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, 12th edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. L. 2003. “Toward a Global Theory of Mind: The Potential Benefits of Presenting a Range of IR Theories through Active Learning.” International Studies Perspectives 4: 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics.” International Organization 42: 427–60.Google Scholar
Sousa, David J. 2004. “ Democracy and Markets: The IPE of NAFTA.” In Introduction to International Political Economy, Third Edition, eds. David N. Balaam and Michael Veseth. New York: Pearson-Prentice-Hall, 264–80.Google Scholar
Switky, Bob. 2004. “Party Strategies and Electoral Systems: Simulating Coalition Governments.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (January): 101–4.Google Scholar
Vizentini, Paulo G. F. 2004. “ The FTAA and US Strategy: A Southern Point of View.” In Free Trade for the Americas? The United States' Push for the FTAA Agreement, eds. Paulo Vizentini and Marianne Wiesbron. London: Zed Books, 11–22.Google Scholar