Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T16:28:06.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulating the Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process in the Undergraduate Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2009

Julie A. Loggins
Affiliation:
Western Carolina University

Abstract

A simulation of the foreign policy decision-making process, as described in this article, can assist an instructor in linking students' abstract understanding of complex political events, circumstances, and decision making to the real-world interplay of the multiple factors involved in decision making. It is this type of active learning that helps bring a student's abstract understanding into the concrete world. Instead of being passive learners relying on an instructor's knowledge, students are active participants in the learning process.

Type
The Teacher
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Graham T., and Halperin, Morton H.. 1972. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications.” World Politics 24 (Spring Supplement: Theory and Policy in International Relations): 4079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T., and Zelikow, Philip. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Art, Robert. 1973. “Bureaucratic Politics and American Foreign Policy: A Critique.” Policy Sciences 4: 467–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beasley, Ryan K., Kaarbo, Juliet, Hermann, Charles F., and Hermann, Margaret G.. 2001. “People and Processes in Foreign Policymaking: Insights from Comparative Case Studies.” International Studies Review 3 (2): 217–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Jonathan, and Hammond, Thomas. 1992. “Rethinking Allison's Models.” American Political Science Review 86 (2): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, Michael. 1977. “India's Devaluation of 1966: Linkage Politics and Crisis Decision Making.” British Journal of International Studies 3: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2002. “Domestic Politics and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 46: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph, and Morrow, James. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Dan. 1977. “Bureaucratic Foreign Policy-Making.” American Behavioral Scientist 21: 87110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Scott. 2005. “The Net Generation Goes to College.” The Chronicle of Higher Education October 7. http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i07/07a03401.htm.Google Scholar
Center for Teaching, Learning, and Scholarship. 2007. “Background of Problem-Based Learning.” Samford University. http://www.samford.edu/ctls/pbl_background.html.Google Scholar
Chittick, William O. 2006. American Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Dorn, Dean S. 1989. “Simulation Games: One More Tool on the Pedagogical Shelf.” Teaching Sociology 17 (1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foyle, Douglas. 1999. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Elite Beliefs as a Mediating Variable.” International Studies Quarterly 41: 141–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1979. “The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-Making Behavior: The ‘Operational Code.’” In Psychological Models in International Politics, ed. Falkowski, L. S.. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Stern, Eric. 2002. “Harnessing Conflict in Foreign Policy Making: From Devil's Advocate to Multiple Advocacy.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32: 484508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Thomas W. 1994. “Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In The New Politics of American Foreign Policy, ed. Deese, D. A.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton H. 1971. “Why Bureaucrats Play Games.” Foreign Policy, Spring, 7080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, Patrick J., and Vanderbush, Walt. 1999. “The Role of Ethnic Interest Groups in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Case of the Cuban American National Foundation.” International Studies Quarterly 43: 348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Charles F. 1963. “Some Consequences of Crisis Which Limit the Viability of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 8: 6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Margaret G. 1998. “International Decision Making: Leadership Matters.” Foreign Policy 110: 124–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1970. “The Operational Code Approach to the Study of Political Leaders: John Foster Dulles' Philosophical and Instrumental Beliefs.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 3: 123–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus.” International Studies Quarterly 36: 439–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Irving L. 1982. Groupthink. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1972. “Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison's Wonderland).” Foreign Policy 7: 159–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longley, Jeanne, and Pruitt, Dean G.. 1980. “Groupthink: A Critique of Janis's Theory.” Review of Personality and Social Psychology 1: 7493.Google Scholar
Major, Claire H., and Palmer, Betsy. 2001. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Lessons from the Literature.” Academic Exchange Quarterly 5 (1). http://www.rapidintellect.com/AEQweb/mop4spr01.htm.Google Scholar
Marra, Robin F., Ostrom, Charles W., and Simon, Dennis M.. 1990. “Foreign Policy and Presidential Popularity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34: 588623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeachie, Wilbert J., and Svinicki, Marilla. 2006. “Active Learning: Cooperative, Collaborative, and Peer Learning.” In McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, ed. McKeachie, W. J. and Svinicki, M.. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42: 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raines, Claire. 2002. “Managing Millennials.” In Connecting Generations: The Sourcebook for a New Workplace, ed. Raines, Claire. Menlo Park, CA: Crisp Publications.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1991. “Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies.” World Politics 43: 479512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, Jerel A., and Scott, James M.. 2007. The Politics of United States Foreign Policy. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Uriel, 't Hart, Paul, and Kouzmin, Alexander. 1991. “The Bureaucratic Politics of Crisis Management.” Public Administration 69: 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2000. “Who Leads and Who Follows? U.S. Presidents, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy.” In Decisionmaking in a Glass House, ed. Nacos, B. Lebens, Shapiro, R. Y., and Isneria, P.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Skiba, Diane J., and Barton, Amy J.. 2006. “Adapting Your Teaching to Accommodate the Net Generation of Learners.” The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 11 (2). http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume112006/Number2May31/tpc30_416076.aspx.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Bell, Douglas. 1993. “Domestic Imperatives and Rational Models of Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation, ed. Skidmore, D. and Hudson, V. M.. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Loggins supplementary material

Sample options

Download Loggins supplementary material(File)
File 49.2 KB