Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:19:58.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should You Brush Your Teeth on November 6, 1984: A Rational Choice Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2022

A Wuffle*
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was not prepared for delivery at the Conference on Voter Turnout, May 16–19, 1979 at the Half Moon Inn, San Diego, California. Resemblances between toothbrushing and certain electoral behavior of interest to political scientists are, therefore, no doubt, purely coincidental.

References

Boyd, Richard W.Decline of U.S. Voter Turnout: Structural Explanations,” American Politics Quarterly 9, 2 (April 1981), 133160.10.1177/1532673X8100900201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard. “The Puzzle of Politician Participation in America.” In King, Anthony (Ed.), The New American Political System (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978), pp. 287324.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert. “Why Do People Vote? Because They Are Registered.” Paper presented at the Conference on Voter Turnout, San Diego, May 16–19, 1979.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John and Fionna, Morris. “The Paradox of Not Voting: A Derision Theoretic Analysis,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 51, 2 (1974), 625635.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John and Fiorina, Morris. “Closeness Counts Only in Horseshoes and Dancing,” American Political Science Review (September 1975), 920925.10.2307/1958405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. “Models of Turnout: An Idiosyncratic Review,” Public Choice 41 (1983), 5561.10.1007/BF00124049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A.Restricted Utilitarianism,” Ethics 71 (1961), 301302. Reprinted in Macropolitics (Chicago: Aldine, 1969), pp. 194–196.10.1086/291365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard. “The Costs of Voting and Nonvoting,” Public Choice 27 (1976), 115119.10.1007/BF01718955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. “The Concepts of Rules,” Philosophical Review 64 (1955), 332.10.2307/2182230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William and Ordeshook, Peter. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973).Google Scholar
Riker, William H. and Ordeshook, Peter. “A Theory of the Calculus of Nonvoting”, American Political Science Review 62 (1968), 2542.10.2307/1953324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. C. C.Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism,” Philosophical Quarterly 29 (October 1956), 344354.10.2307/2216786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, Richard G. “Possible Consequences of Election Day Registration.” Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar
Traugott, Michael and Katosh, John P.. “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior.” Paper presented at the Conference on Voter Turnout, San Diego, May 16–19, 1979.10.1086/268527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert and Grofman, Bernard. “Candidate Evaluations and Turnout,” American Politics Quarterly 9, 2 (April 1981), 197219.10.1177/1532673X8100900204CrossRefGoogle Scholar