Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:41:31.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Science and Political Science Redux”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2005

Kim Quaile Hill
Kim Quaile Hill
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am pleased to have the opportunity to respond to Oren, Ozminkowski, and Strake's comments on my recent article on myths about the physical sciences. All of them in my judgment either misperceive parts of my original argument or raise concerns that allow me to extend that argument. To the degree that others share their views, this essay may address widespread differences of opinion or misperceptions about these matters.

Type
Departments
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 6 - 7
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boston David. 2002. “Political Science in the United States: Past and Present.” In The Development of Political Science, eds. David Easton, John G. Gunnell, and Luigi Graziano. London: Routledge, 275– 291.Google Scholar
Crick Bernard. 1954. “The Science of Politics in the United States.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 20 (August): 308– 320.Google Scholar
Hill Kim Quaile. 1997. “In Search of Policy Theory.” Policy Currents 7 (April): 1– 9.Google Scholar
Hill Kim Quaile. 2002. “The Lamentable State of Science Education in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 35 (March): 113– 116.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick Evron M. 1962. “The Impact of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science.” In Essays on the Behavioral Study of Politics, ed. Austin Ranney. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 29.Google Scholar
Kuhn Thomas. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn Naomi B. 1983. “Self Portrait: Profile of Political Scientists.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association, 95– 126.Google Scholar
Nagel Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Schlagel Richard H. 1995. From Myth to Modern Mind: A Study of the Origins and Growth of Scientific Thought. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Somit Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1967. The Development of American Political Science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Watson James D. 1968. The Double Helix. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar