Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:12:51.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to “Predicting and Dissecting the Seat-Votes Curve in the 2006 U.S. House Election”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

Theodore S. Arrington
Theodore S. Arrington
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The article on the seats-votes curve by Kastellec, Gelman, and Chandler (January 2008, 139–45) presents interesting and helpful analysis and data. Especially important is the insight that incumbency necessarily requires a minority party to receive more than 50% of the vote to gain control of the House of Representatives. However the article is misleading in two respects.

Type
Forum
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 473 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burden, Barry C., and Kimball, David C.. 2004. Why Americans Split Their Ticket: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Carmines, Edward G., Mondak, Jeffery J., and Zeemering, Eric. 2007. “Information, Activation, and Electoral Competition in the 2002 Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 69 (August): 798–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1993. “Getting the Details Right: A Comment on ‘The Changing Meaning of Elector Marginality in the U.S. house Elections 1824–1978.’” Political Research Quarterly 46 (March): 49–54.Google Scholar