Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:23:38.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Republican

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2022

Douglas I. Hodgkin
Douglas I. Hodgkin*
Affiliation:
Bates College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My experiences as a delegate to the 1980 Republican National Convention seem to reflect the role of party professional more than that of political amateur. The professional seeks party unity, supports the nominee despite disagreements on issues, and works for the party year after year, win or lose, whether or not he likes the current candidates or some issue stands of the party (Soule and McGrath, 1975).

Having been active in the Republican Party for 12 years, including service on the state committee, as chairman of the Second Congressional District Committee, and currently as chairman of the State Platform Committee, I presumably qualified as a professional in terms of length and character of involvement (Roback, 1975). Furthermore, this service provided the wide recognition within the party that has traditionally been important for selection as national delegate by the Maine State or Congressional District Conventions.

Type
Political Scientists as Delegates and Alternates
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , Winter 1981 , pp. 34 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crotty, William J. (1971). “Party Effort and Its Impact on the Vote.” American Political Science Review 65: 439–50.10.2307/1954460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. (1979). “Caucuses and Primaries: Measuring Reform in the Presidential Nomination Process.” American Politics Quarterly 7: 155–74.10.1177/1532673X7900700204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roback, Thomas H. (1975). “Amateurs and Professionals: Delegates to the 1972 Republican National Convention.” Journal of Politics 37: 436–67.10.1017/S0022381600041232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, John W., and Clarke, James W. (1970). “Amateurs and Professionals: A Study of Delegates to the 1968 Democratic National Convention.” American Political Science Review 64: 888–98.10.2307/1953470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, John W., and McGrath, Wilma E. (1975). “A Comparative Study of Presidential Nomination Conventions: The Democrats 1968 and 1972.” American Journal of Political Science 19: 501–17.10.2307/2110541CrossRefGoogle Scholar