Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2022
Does a researcher have a legal right not to reveal the identity of sources or subjects and not to reveal information obtained in confidence in the course of research, when asked to do so by a grand jury or other investigatory body? Should a researcher have such a right? Under what circumstances, if any, does a researcher have an ethical obligation to promise a source of information not to reveal the identity of the source and the content of what is learned? What position should the various social science associations take, if any, on questions of the ethical responsibilities and legal rights of researchers concerning the confidentiality of research sources and information?
The above questions, among others, are believed to be of fundamental importance to the social science community. Under the initiative of the American Political Science Association, a research project was conceived to investigate these questions and others, and to recommend alternative solutions. A grant was secured from the Russell-Sage Foundation and co-sponsorship arranged through the Consortium of Social Science Associations, of the various national social science associations, including the American Anthropological Association, the American Economic Association, the American Historical Association, the APSA, the American Psychological Association, the American Sociological Association, the Association of American Law Schools, and the Association of American Geographers. In addition, liaison relationships were established with the American Statistical Association, the American Association for Public Opinion Research, the American Psychiatric Association, and the Oral History Association.
page 259 note * For a more exhaustive treatment of these issues and the Popkin case, see Carroll, James D., “Confidential of Social Science Research Sources and Data: The Popkin Case,” PS, VI:3 (Summer 1973), pp. 268–280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Committee on Professional Ethics and Academic Freedom, Annual Report, PS, VI:3 (Summer 1973) pp. 340–341, and Committee on Professional Ethics and Academic Freedom, “Advisory Opinion No. 13: The Scholar's Ethical Obligation to Protect Confidential Sources,” PS, VI:4 (Fall 1973), p. 451.Google Scholar