Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:19:02.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics in Action: Wolves, Snowmobiles, and Bison and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2008

Soleiman Kiasatpour  and
Christopher Whitfield
Soleiman Kiasatpour
Affiliation:
Western Kentucky University
Christopher Whitfield
Affiliation:
Western Kentucky University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Faculty are always grappling with how to get their students to actively participate in learning about politics. Interest in active learning, service learning, and other pedagogical approaches demonstrate this concern. At the same time we are witnessing a parallel and related mission promoting civic engagement. For example, the American Association of State Colleges and Universities' American Democracy Project has a civic engagement series in which it collaborates with campuses across the United States to encourage increased political participation and civic awareness of topics such as the stewardship of public lands and jury service, to name a few. What can instructors do in the classroom to bring these learning methods together and accomplish these goals? We suggest that outlining and describing the political dynamics of interest group activity in an interesting issue area, and then requiring students to advocate on behalf of these interests in class role-play scenarios and other exercises, help to accomplish active learning, which may lead to greater civic engagement.The authors thank Michael J. Yochim for his insightful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript and George L. Mehaffy, vice president for Academic Leadership and Change at the American Association of State Colleges and Universities and the founder of the American Democracy Project, for organizing our visit to Yellowstone National Park.

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 193 - 206
Copyright
© 2008 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Democracy Project. Mission statement, civic engagement in action series. www.aascu.org/programs/adp/default.htm (September 8, 2006).Google Scholar
“Arctic Cats, and Buffalo: Yellowstone may not be Big Enough for Both its Growing Herds of Snowmobiles and its Bison.” 1997. Time 149 (March 17): 62.Google Scholar
Balyeat, Joe. 2002. “Guest Opinion: Federal Authorities Suppress Wolf Research.” Billings Gazette. March 9. www.billingsgazette.com/newdex.php?display=rednews/2002/05/09/build/opinion/guestopinion1.inc (November 4, 2006).Google Scholar
Brock, Kathy L., and Beverly J. Cameron. 1999. “Enlivening Political Science Courses with Kolb's Learning Preference Model.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (2): 251–6.Google Scholar
Clark, T. W., and A. H. Harvey. 1990. “The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Policy Arena.” Society and Natural Resources 3: 281–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemons, Randall, and Mark K. McBeth. 2001. Public Policy Praxis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Coalition of National Park Service Retirees. 2006. “Yellowstone Air Quality Press Release: Studies Show Yellowstone Air Quality Tied to Sharp Reduction in Snowmobile Numbers.” November 15. www.npsretirees.org/node/112 (November 16, 2006).Google Scholar
Cutler, Cecile, and Iain Hay. 2000. “‘Club Dread’: Applying and Refining an Issues-Based Role Play on Environment, Economy, and Culture.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 24: 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Beth K. 2003. “Byzantine Politics: Using Simulations to Make Sense of the Middle East.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (2): 239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1997. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Endersby, James W., and David J. Webber. 1995. “Iron Triangle Simulation: A Role-Playing Game for Undergraduates in Congress, Interest Groups, and Public Policy Classes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (3): 520–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hensley, Thomas R. 1993. “Come to the Edge: Role Playing Activities in a Constitutional Law Class.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (1): 64–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laswell, Harold D. 1938. Politics: Who Gets What, When and How. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Holly Brasher. 2004. Organized Interests and American Government. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McBeth, Mark K., and Elizabeth A. Shanahan. 2004. “Public Opinion for Sale: The Role of Policy Marketers in Greater Yellowstone Policy Conflict.” Policy Sciences 37: 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mileur, Jerome M. 1992. “The Politics of E. E. Schattschneider.” PS: Political Science and Politics 25 (2): 176–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Park Service. 2005. Statistical Abstract, National Park Service, Public Use Statistics Office. www2.nature.nps.gov/stats/abst2005.pdf. (October 8, 2006).Google Scholar
Nie, Martin A. 2003. Beyond Wolves: The Politics of Wolf Recovery and Management. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
“Nominee Endorses Snowmobile Use.” 2006. Billings Gazette. October 1. www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2006/10/01/news/wyoming/40-nominee.txt (October 22, 2006).Google Scholar
Quillen, Ed. 1999. “Isn't it about time for a New West Celebration?” High Country News, September 13. www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=5264 (March 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark. 2005. “The Allocation and Distribution of Resources.” In Debating the Earth: The Environmental Politics Reader, ed. John S. Dryzek and David Schlosberg. New York: Oxford University Press, 147–62.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1969. Two Hundred Million Americans in Search of a Government. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Diane E. 2000. Writing in Political Science: A Practical Guide. 2nd edition. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Shellman, Stephen M. 2001. “Active Learning in Comparative Politics: A Mock German Election and Coalition-Formation Simulation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (4): 827–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Elizabeth T., and Mark A. Boyer. 1996. “Designing In-Class Simulations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (4): 690–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Ted. 2002. Down to Earth: Nature's Role in American History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiles, Jim. 2005. “Old West vs. New West.” The Arizona Republic, April 13. www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/0413stiles13.html (March 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 2001. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tollefson, Jeff. “Finding a Future for West Yellowstone: Local Contingent Sees Hope in Snowmobile Ban.” Gazette Wyoming Bureau. 27 December 2000.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. House of Representatives. 2005. The Yellowstone Buffalo Preservation Act. 109th Congress. 2428.Google Scholar
Westheimer, Joel, and Joseph Kahne. 2004. “Educating the ‘Good’ Citizen: Political Choices and Pedagogical Goals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37(2): 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Matthew A. 1997. “The Wolf in Yellowstone: Science, Symbol or Politics? Deconstructing the Conflict Between Environmentalism and Wise Use.” Society & Natural Resources 10 443–468.Google Scholar
Yochim, Michael J. 1999. “The Development of Snowmobile Policy in Yellowstone National Park.” Yellowstone Science 7 (Spring): 2–10.Google Scholar
Yochim, Michael J. 2004. “Compromising Yellowstone: The Interest Group-National Park Service Relationship in Modern Policy-making.” Ph.D. diss. University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar