Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:46:58.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Consultancy Overseas: The Internationalization of Campaign Consultancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David M. Farrell*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester

Extract

The work of campaign consultants in elections outside of their countries of origin is a relatively recent phenomenon. Joe Napolitan is credited as becoming the first international consultant in modern times when, in 1969, he worked on the successful reelection bid of Ferdinand Marcos. As recently as 1972, Napolitan wrote of a certain reticence in some countries toward using non-native campaign consultants A decade later, Larry Sabato (1981) saw evidence that use of non-native consultants was becoming a more accepted practice in campaigns worldwide. By the end of the 1990s, according to David Swanson and Paolo Mancini (1996), consultants from the U.S., Germany, France, and Britain were becoming increasingly active in elections outside their own countries. Since the use of non-native campaign consultants is likely to increase into the forseeable future, I would like to use this article to set forth the beginnings of a research agenda, to present an outline of a project worth pursuing, for determining how and why foreign consultants are being, can be, or should be used. The article has three parts. First, I present an overview, based on available evidence, of the nature of overseas work by campaign consultants. Second, I explore some possible explanations for the rise of this phenomenon. Third, I assess the main institutional factors affecting the internationalization of consultancy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article was drafted while I was a Fellow at the Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, in the spring of 1997. I am grateful to colleagues there for their encouragement, and to the participants at the POP Workshop for helpful feedback.

References

Angell, Alan, Kinzo, M. D'Alva, and Urbaneja, D. 1992. “Latin America.” In Electioneering, ed. Butler, D. and Ranney, A. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Blumler, Jay, Kavanagh, Dennis, and Nossiter, T. J. 1996. “Modern Communications versus Traditional Politics in Britain: Unstable Marriage of Convenience.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, ed. Swanson, D. and Mancini, P. Wesport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Farrell, David, eds. 1992. Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Ranney, A., eds. 1992. Electioneering. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Curtis, G. 1988. The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Darnolf, Staffan. 1997. Democratic Electioneering in Southern Africa: The Contrasting Cases of Botswana and Zimbabwe. Göteborg: Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Farrell, David. 1996. “Campaign Strategies and Tactics.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. LeDuc, L., Niemi, R., and Norris, P. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Farrell, David. 1997. “Campaign Professionalization and Political Parties.” Presented at the Workshop on Change in the Relationship of Parties and Democracy, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Lord, Christopher. 1997. Political Parties in the European Union. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaid, L., Gerstlè, J., and Sanders, K., eds. 1991. Mediated Politics in Two Cultures: Presidential Campaigning in the United States and France. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, Dennis. 1995. Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Manor, James. 1992. “India.” In Electioneering, ed. Butler, D. and Ranney, A. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Napolitan, Joe. 1972. The Election Game: And How to Win It. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Negrine, R., and Papathanassopoulos, S. 1996. “The Americanization of Political Communication: A Critique.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 1(2): 4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Duschinsky, Michael. 1991. “Foreign Political Aid: The German Political Foundations and their U.S. Counterparts.” International Affairs 67(1): 3363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabato, Larry. 1981. The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Scammell, Margaret. 1995. Designer Politics: How Elections are Won. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scammell, Margaret. 1997. “The Wisdom of the War Room: U.S. Campaigning and Americanization.” Joan Shorenstein Center on Press, Politics and Public Policy Research Paper, R-17, April.Google Scholar
Sisk, Timothy. 1994. “A U.S. Perspective on South Africa's 1994 Election.” In Election '94 South Africa: The Campaigns, Results and Future Prospects, ed. Reynolds, Andrew. Cape Town and Johannesburg: David Philip.Google Scholar
Swanson, David, and Mancini, Paolo. 1996. “Patterns of Modern Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, ed. Swanson, D. and Mancini, P. Wesport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
West, Paul. 1989. “America's Latest Export: Political Consultants.” Campaigns & Elections 10(1): 1520.Google Scholar